The problem is, that you can't secure funding to start your own Twitter or FagBook, because Zionist Merchants also control the payment processors and banks. Look what PayPal, Chase, and VISA do, as well as Patron, eBay, CloudFare, etc.
Even just getting a competing app to market would be impossible, because Google and Apple will ban it from the playstore catalog.
Yep I feel like that "private company" argument loses all its punch when there is no free market to challenge Facebook, Twitter, and Youtube. It's a miracle places like voat or poal even exist.
I'm glad to see there's finally posters on voat who don't drool and trip over themselves on how the free market solves everything. Free market is how the fucking hookniggers took control. They don't play by any rules other than whatever gives us the advantage. The mere fact Congress passes laws after the fact when some of their crimes come out in public is lost on the invisible hand will fix it all moron free market pushers. Said laws never remove the bad actors from control, just finger wagging on don't do that anymore.
The truth is even repaling section 230 will probably fuck smaller sites over, if we had actual free market qe would not have a handfull of financers all controlled by the same people. They qill choke their competitors out by preventing thwm from making any money and asking their pals at google to bury the sites. Its all a shambles. If the market were truly free these sites wouldnt have such a large presence.
They have publisher laws already, they just don't classify these companies as them. The section 230 thing is so they can fuck over small sites (goal.).
Based. "Muh free market!" is just boomer/lolbertarian for "As long as the jews control me "privately" instead of directly through the government, it's okay to be utterly destroyed".
view the rest of the comments →
ManchesterT ago
"Private company" argument:
The problem is, that you can't secure funding to start your own Twitter or FagBook, because Zionist Merchants also control the payment processors and banks. Look what PayPal, Chase, and VISA do, as well as Patron, eBay, CloudFare, etc.
Even just getting a competing app to market would be impossible, because Google and Apple will ban it from the playstore catalog.
Nevyn ago
But that "private company" bakery still had to bake a cake for faggots.
If leftists didn't have double standards they'd have no standards at all.
YamaMaya ago
Yep I feel like that "private company" argument loses all its punch when there is no free market to challenge Facebook, Twitter, and Youtube. It's a miracle places like voat or poal even exist.
ManchesterT ago
They have to let the glowies have somewhere to recruit
B3bomber ago
I'm glad to see there's finally posters on voat who don't drool and trip over themselves on how the free market solves everything. Free market is how the fucking hookniggers took control. They don't play by any rules other than whatever gives us the advantage. The mere fact Congress passes laws after the fact when some of their crimes come out in public is lost on the invisible hand will fix it all moron free market pushers. Said laws never remove the bad actors from control, just finger wagging on don't do that anymore.
YamaMaya ago
The truth is even repaling section 230 will probably fuck smaller sites over, if we had actual free market qe would not have a handfull of financers all controlled by the same people. They qill choke their competitors out by preventing thwm from making any money and asking their pals at google to bury the sites. Its all a shambles. If the market were truly free these sites wouldnt have such a large presence.
B3bomber ago
They have publisher laws already, they just don't classify these companies as them. The section 230 thing is so they can fuck over small sites (goal.).
BasedWolf ago
Based. "Muh free market!" is just boomer/lolbertarian for "As long as the jews control me "privately" instead of directly through the government, it's okay to be utterly destroyed".