The science is settled. 97% of scientists agree that burning 6,000,000 jews is a carbon threat to our environment and a catalyst for climate change that requires socialist financing for large government bureaucracies. Checkmate, ClimateCaust Deniers!
Great argument and very funny. However, when talking to someone who believes in the theory of carbon dioxide influencing climate change, it is worth mentioning the document from which it began. The 1997 Kyoto Protocol described the mythical layer of carbon dioxide accumulating in the stratosphere as the cause of warming and creating the greenhouse effect. None of the idiots who signed up for it noticed that carbon dioxide is heavier than the air and accumulates at the surface of the earth, where plants and algae can take it for photosynthesis rather than in the stratosphere.
Yeah. The main thing I noticed about Climate Change Denial canards is that they employ the same M.O. as Holocaust Denial canards. They start the assumption that their conclusion is a priori truth without actually being able to back up their assertions when questioned. When questions get too hard, they resort slurs and ad hominems: "Denier" "Racist" "Idiot".
Then after they have "totally owned" you, they go into pigeon chess mode while you slowly begin to hate them.
view the rest of the comments →
Rockfish1000 ago
The science is settled. 97% of scientists agree that burning 6,000,000 jews is a carbon threat to our environment and a catalyst for climate change that requires socialist financing for large government bureaucracies. Checkmate, ClimateCaust Deniers!
Psalm19_1 ago
Great argument and very funny. However, when talking to someone who believes in the theory of carbon dioxide influencing climate change, it is worth mentioning the document from which it began. The 1997 Kyoto Protocol described the mythical layer of carbon dioxide accumulating in the stratosphere as the cause of warming and creating the greenhouse effect. None of the idiots who signed up for it noticed that carbon dioxide is heavier than the air and accumulates at the surface of the earth, where plants and algae can take it for photosynthesis rather than in the stratosphere.
Rockfish1000 ago
Yeah. The main thing I noticed about Climate Change Denial canards is that they employ the same M.O. as Holocaust Denial canards. They start the assumption that their conclusion is a priori truth without actually being able to back up their assertions when questioned. When questions get too hard, they resort slurs and ad hominems: "Denier" "Racist" "Idiot".
Then after they have "totally owned" you, they go into pigeon chess mode while you slowly begin to hate them.