The China virus is no more serious or significant than a chest cold. This has become so fucking obvious, it is painful. Yet we still have lockdowns and masks. It's retarded, or rather, our leaders are retarded, and we are retarded for following them.
Compliance training. Weeding out the "naughty", pro-freedom crowd. Testing lockdown infrastructure. Testing supply chains. Getting favorable precedent on the books from any legal challenges. Gearing up and organizing the communist death squads. Identifying any potential militia formation hotbeds.
A dry run for the communists when they go around taking guns and killing their political opposition.
Will they kick it off in Nov? I don't think so. If they're smart they'll just wait out the 4 years and go full communism then. Or, if they know the Free Gibs won't hold out 4 more years, it'll happen this Nov.
You've summed it up nicely. Except this time it's world wide which shows that this is no longer a drill. Essential worker in different houses every day, gas stations, what not without masks or hand sanitizer. This is not a drill because there's no easy way to back way from this one unless they can convince the ones who comply in "breaking" news that it was just another Harambe.
Not only that but the “testing” for Covid is actually a test for the common cold.
“A positive test result shows you may have antibodies from an infection with the virus that causes COVID-19. However, there is a chance a positive result means that you have antibodies from an infection with a virus from the same family of viruses (called coronaviruses), such as the one that causes the common cold.”
None of it matters. The test only shows whether or not you have contracted something that is common. Coronavirus is a family of virus that we’ve known about for a long time. It’s usually not that harmful to people. It’s a large family though. They are just conflating every positive test for any antibodies from any Coronavirus in that family and saying it’s “Covid-19,” a virus they can’t even prove is real.
It matters because I want to use the information as a source to share with other people. I fully agree with you, I am just looking for a source.
The link you posted is about a "past incident". Have you come across a source that says the test for an "active case" is also just looking for any coronavirus?
My source is the CDC website. This is a quote directly from it.
“A positive test result shows you may have antibodies from an infection with the virus that causes COVID-19. However, there is a chance a positive result means that you have antibodies from an infection with a virus from the same family of viruses (called coronaviruses), such as the one that causes the common cold.”
You are literally quoting a page called "Test for Past Infection". That page is all about:
Antibody tests check your blood by looking for antibodies, which may tell you if you had a past infection with the virus that causes COVID-19.
and
Antibody tests should not be used to diagnose a current COVID-19 infection, except in instances in which viral testing is delayed. An antibody test may not show if you have a current COVID-19 infection because it can take 1–3 weeks after infection for your body to make antibodies.
That is what they are testing you for. Lol. Don’t you get it? I’m telling you that the numbers are bullshit because this is the test. Not arguing with you about what this test is but I am telling that it is the test they are using to get their numbers.
view the rest of the comments →
ardvarcus ago
The China virus is no more serious or significant than a chest cold. This has become so fucking obvious, it is painful. Yet we still have lockdowns and masks. It's retarded, or rather, our leaders are retarded, and we are retarded for following them.
tourgen ago
Compliance training. Weeding out the "naughty", pro-freedom crowd. Testing lockdown infrastructure. Testing supply chains. Getting favorable precedent on the books from any legal challenges. Gearing up and organizing the communist death squads. Identifying any potential militia formation hotbeds.
A dry run for the communists when they go around taking guns and killing their political opposition.
Will they kick it off in Nov? I don't think so. If they're smart they'll just wait out the 4 years and go full communism then. Or, if they know the Free Gibs won't hold out 4 more years, it'll happen this Nov.
GeneralDisposition ago
You've summed it up nicely. Except this time it's world wide which shows that this is no longer a drill. Essential worker in different houses every day, gas stations, what not without masks or hand sanitizer. This is not a drill because there's no easy way to back way from this one unless they can convince the ones who comply in "breaking" news that it was just another Harambe.
blackguard19 ago
There is no “China virus.” The CDC literally admitted in July that it doesn’t exist.
https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2020/10/08/the-smoking-gun-where-is-the-coronavirus-the-cdc-says-it-isnt-available/
danjo_kandui ago
Not only that but the “testing” for Covid is actually a test for the common cold.
germinator ago
Is the "am I currently infected with cv-1984" also a common cold test?
The linked page is specifically about "Past Infection".
danjo_kandui ago
None of it matters. The test only shows whether or not you have contracted something that is common. Coronavirus is a family of virus that we’ve known about for a long time. It’s usually not that harmful to people. It’s a large family though. They are just conflating every positive test for any antibodies from any Coronavirus in that family and saying it’s “Covid-19,” a virus they can’t even prove is real.
germinator ago
It matters because I want to use the information as a source to share with other people. I fully agree with you, I am just looking for a source.
The link you posted is about a "past incident". Have you come across a source that says the test for an "active case" is also just looking for any coronavirus?
danjo_kandui ago
My source is the CDC website. This is a quote directly from it.
This has nothing to do with past cases. This is the CDC explaining what a positive test means.
germinator ago
You are not correct.
You are literally quoting a page called "Test for Past Infection". That page is all about:
danjo_kandui ago
That is what they are testing you for. Lol. Don’t you get it? I’m telling you that the numbers are bullshit because this is the test. Not arguing with you about what this test is but I am telling that it is the test they are using to get their numbers.
germinator ago
I now understand what you are saying. Thank you very much.
whambamthankyouham ago
It is even worse. The 'test' is totally useless. It doesn't find anything and cannot find anything.
Ducktalesooo000ooo ago
So they told you the truth about the existence of a virus and where the virus originated from...
And then started telling you lies about the virus after you learned where it came from?
Lol