This form of Pavlovian conditioning is so widespread in the occult mainstream media. "47 days away"--immediately followed by, "less than one month."
Yo that's over one month.
It's intended to train the viewership to be wrongly trustful. Giving them a chance to think, "Hh, that was an accident," rather than the truth, which is that it was intentional, because Tucker is a cliquist and a mind control guy.
It's also an opportunity to lower expectations and to promote docility. "Receive this idiosyncratic happenstance in a docile way. Labor within yourself to justify the error as accidental." Even if you suspect it was made with malice aforethought, even if that's so, ascribe nothing to it. Still think nothing of it.
It also is meant to shift people's understanding of human nature. To re-inforce that human nature is different from what it is. I guess this goes along with lowered expectations. "The notion Tucker could make such an egregious error on accident, well, it's plausible." When truly that is not what sharp ratiocination commands. Very precise reasoning is skeptical as hell about the occurrence of that error.
This type of mind control is everywhere in mainstream media right now and on a scale never before seen.
Also, keep in mind, it's Tucker. People who believe him are way closer to the truth than some green-haired nose ring girl. It's meant to control the higher IQ midwit who is still willing to trust Tucker unconditionally.
Its disappointing, too. Because he's so likable. I used to really enjoy watching him until I realized it was just therapy for the people who are mad nothing is happening.
Did you catch he said that we will be "voting for a new president," instead of something like voting for the president, or voting to see if Trump will be re-elected?
Really any errors in anything he says are completely inexcusable. He has a team of writers who go over every nuance. But as per usual, this is just part of the great machine's hardward running the software as it was programmed to do.
This accident vs. malice question is the gist of conspiracy research, with the conspiracist believing malice. A couple snippets. From Robert Welch's The Politician https://files.catbox.moe/uqvhed.png
view the rest of the comments →
poopdawg15 ago
This form of Pavlovian conditioning is so widespread in the occult mainstream media. "47 days away"--immediately followed by, "less than one month."
Yo that's over one month.
It's intended to train the viewership to be wrongly trustful. Giving them a chance to think, "Hh, that was an accident," rather than the truth, which is that it was intentional, because Tucker is a cliquist and a mind control guy.
It's also an opportunity to lower expectations and to promote docility. "Receive this idiosyncratic happenstance in a docile way. Labor within yourself to justify the error as accidental." Even if you suspect it was made with malice aforethought, even if that's so, ascribe nothing to it. Still think nothing of it.
It also is meant to shift people's understanding of human nature. To re-inforce that human nature is different from what it is. I guess this goes along with lowered expectations. "The notion Tucker could make such an egregious error on accident, well, it's plausible." When truly that is not what sharp ratiocination commands. Very precise reasoning is skeptical as hell about the occurrence of that error.
This type of mind control is everywhere in mainstream media right now and on a scale never before seen.
Also, keep in mind, it's Tucker. People who believe him are way closer to the truth than some green-haired nose ring girl. It's meant to control the higher IQ midwit who is still willing to trust Tucker unconditionally.
The guy really is a snake.
Warnos44 ago
Its disappointing, too. Because he's so likable. I used to really enjoy watching him until I realized it was just therapy for the people who are mad nothing is happening.
Did you catch he said that we will be "voting for a new president," instead of something like voting for the president, or voting to see if Trump will be re-elected?
Really any errors in anything he says are completely inexcusable. He has a team of writers who go over every nuance. But as per usual, this is just part of the great machine's hardward running the software as it was programmed to do.
poopdawg15 ago
This accident vs. malice question is the gist of conspiracy research, with the conspiracist believing malice. A couple snippets. From Robert Welch's The Politician https://files.catbox.moe/uqvhed.png
From Josephson's Rockefeller “Internationalist”: The Man Who Misrules the World. https://files.catbox.moe/tox49c.png