You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

DiegoVanLoon ago

Yeah we know shills pushing all sorts of bs infest this and other message boards here and everywhere else .. we are gonna say you are one of them, that you do not have a wife nor is she preggers that you are beating the ultrasound drum on behalf of genocidal interests who want autism and birth defect levels to increase among the target - white - population.

Ultrasound appears to have set the human specie on a tragic path due to the subtle and not so subtle effects of ultrasound exposure, critics argue the exponential rise in autism incidence is a product of fetal exposure to ultrasound.

Ultrasound is known to have the potential to produce harmful biological effects in the fetus .. Ultrasound for the identification of fetal sex and fetal entertainment imaging should be strictly eliminated, for the best early pregnancy avoid ultrasound.”

Chinese scientists measured damage to the brain, kidney, cornea, chorionic villi, and the immune system. They determined the amount of ultrasound exposure required to produce damage to the human fetus, and that amount was found to be very low. Ultrasound hazards to the human fetus were confirmed without doubt.

The Chinese studies were unknown in the Western realm and little known even in the East. These represent 23 years of critical research, from 1988 to 2011. Unfortunately, these studies were overwhelmed by a tremendous flood of studies that promote medical and therapeutic innovations for ultrasound. Jon Rappoport, the Dangers of Ultrasound..

Maker_Wolf ago

My wife's pregnant, and I've also looked into this. I think you're overstating the danger, but I agree it's not totally safe like people act.

The synopsis of the papers I read is that.

  1. There aren't many studies on the long term effects of ultrasounds.

  2. Many of the ones that were done took place 2 decades ago, and ultrasounds have increased in power by a factor of 10 since then.

  3. Studies have shown small correlations to negative outcomes from ultrasounds. They haven't found anything shocking that I'm aware of, but they didn't find nothing. Interestingly, among other things there was a statistically significant increase in left-handedness in those receiving ultrasounds.

  4. Ultrasound does have well understood mechanisms of damage. It can be used intentionally to destroy tumors in fact. As a result the FDA requires ultrasound machines to display risk indexes for localized heating, and cavitation damage (the two known mechanisms). Alarmingly, a survey of ultrasound techs showed less than 50% understood what these numbers mean...

Based on what I read, we've turned down any ultrasounds that are "optional". And I've told my wife not to use the heartbeat doppler her sister gave her.

I read the link you posted, and I think maybe I need to do more research.

Here's the best paper I found:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3262273/