You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

brother_tempus ago

I will have to concur ... the population of socialists, Marxists, progressives and other garden-variety authoritarians has grown .

personally I would only allow upvoats .. and nodownvoats

MrBunnyVest ago

personally I would only allow upvoats .. and nodownvoats

That's actually a good idea, would you be willing to post it in the subverse for Voat ideas? Can you think of any downsides?

jaceame ago

When someone lies, they get a bunch of upvotes, the lie is found out, they get downvoted.

MrBunnyVest ago

Well, my thinking is that the issue is that people consistently use the downvoat as a disagree button. Take away the downvoat. Then only upvoated content moves to the front, if there is an issue, provide a way to take away the upvoat (that isn't downvoating). Good content moves forward, garbage stays where it belongs, we don't have to worry about assholes downvoating good posts to oblivion. Just brainstorming here, who knows what the answer is.

jaceame ago

I really think people have to realize that there are people that disagree with them though. If everything is positive than no matter how bad a post/comment it will still look accepted. This is how you end up with tumblr. But I agree most downvoats are done by people for bad reasons, but they still serve a purpose. I feel that the best way to take away upvoats with downvoats.

Zednix ago

Not being able to downvote garbage is the downside.