What about "Trick". "Persuade", "Manipulate", "Groom" or otherwise "Con"?
These are laws made without acknowledgement of jewish and jew-like behaviors.
There needs to be a fundamental shift in law, possibly even on the Constitutional level, that prevents the act of attempting to make one man submit to another (or corporate entity) in the form of any control system that impinges on the explicit freedoms of the individual. ie: Any form of "Slavery/Indenturment by another name or technique - even where payment is involved*". Because "Force" is an extremely nebulous term that can mean many things and be made to not mean others, the same way "Consent" is rapidly becoming meaningless through it's current year political and social morph-ability and general abuse.
We need a "this meaning does not and shall not change" addendum to our whole system of Constitutional understanding. Enslavement comes in many forms and by many names, but there should be no confusion about it's fundamental immorality and illegality, and serious punishment attached to any attempt at circumvention and subversion via ALL means - not just "Force". No devious horse-trading. No edging. No legislative nibbling away. No oblique, PR/Spin/Propaganda based attacks on fundamental rights and mores shall be entertained - no matter how "popular" and normalized the idea of ersatz slavery may be presented. Just an unbreakable freedom ethic - if you don't like the way we have things laid out, you are free to leave.
*Because the law should already be well aware of "Company Store" style Captured Economy traps where the money never really leaves the plantation/railroad/closed system enacted by the Slave masters - and the workers/slaves can only ever make enough to cover their keep (where the bosses can't get the taxpayer to cover it, of course, as per Amazon's workers-on-welfare "employment" model). Anti-Trust law supposedly fights this, though it's violated every day by multinationals and mega-corporations who make the "Company Store" system so big it envelopes whole nations (and again, engages in corporate welfare schemes where possible by being "too big to fail").
view the rest of the comments →
Gorillion ago
It's a start, but...
What about "Trick". "Persuade", "Manipulate", "Groom" or otherwise "Con"?
These are laws made without acknowledgement of jewish and jew-like behaviors.
There needs to be a fundamental shift in law, possibly even on the Constitutional level, that prevents the act of attempting to make one man submit to another (or corporate entity) in the form of any control system that impinges on the explicit freedoms of the individual. ie: Any form of "Slavery/Indenturment by another name or technique - even where payment is involved*". Because "Force" is an extremely nebulous term that can mean many things and be made to not mean others, the same way "Consent" is rapidly becoming meaningless through it's current year political and social morph-ability and general abuse.
We need a "this meaning does not and shall not change" addendum to our whole system of Constitutional understanding. Enslavement comes in many forms and by many names, but there should be no confusion about it's fundamental immorality and illegality, and serious punishment attached to any attempt at circumvention and subversion via ALL means - not just "Force". No devious horse-trading. No edging. No legislative nibbling away. No oblique, PR/Spin/Propaganda based attacks on fundamental rights and mores shall be entertained - no matter how "popular" and normalized the idea of ersatz slavery may be presented. Just an unbreakable freedom ethic - if you don't like the way we have things laid out, you are free to leave.
*Because the law should already be well aware of "Company Store" style Captured Economy traps where the money never really leaves the plantation/railroad/closed system enacted by the Slave masters - and the workers/slaves can only ever make enough to cover their keep (where the bosses can't get the taxpayer to cover it, of course, as per Amazon's workers-on-welfare "employment" model). Anti-Trust law supposedly fights this, though it's violated every day by multinationals and mega-corporations who make the "Company Store" system so big it envelopes whole nations (and again, engages in corporate welfare schemes where possible by being "too big to fail").