Kitty Werthmann has been accused of distorting history and keeps very sketchy company. Considering she is in cahoots with conservapedia which is anti science and history being the study of the past, is science, conservapedia doesn't give a crap about actual history (god said the earth is only 6000 yrs old or what ever stupid impossible stuff they believe). She has absolutely none of the integrity of a historian and bashes science, is she really a credible source for anything when she has a political agenda (she is president of conservapedias thinktank)?
view the rest of the comments →
DJexs ago
Kitty Werthmann has been accused of distorting history and keeps very sketchy company. Considering she is in cahoots with conservapedia which is anti science and history being the study of the past, is science, conservapedia doesn't give a crap about actual history (god said the earth is only 6000 yrs old or what ever stupid impossible stuff they believe). She has absolutely none of the integrity of a historian and bashes science, is she really a credible source for anything when she has a political agenda (she is president of conservapedias thinktank)?