You can skip Godel's update of Anselm's ontological argument for God, and instead consider Godel's two incompleteness theorems as a proof that logical positivism took a fundamentally wrong to philosophy of science.

I do encourage people to study at least a little philosophy of science, because we need to have some notion of "justified true belief" in order to make sense of papers like Why Most Published Research Findings Are False and counterarguments like this one.