The only way anyone could possibly believe in the "water-powered car" nonsense is if they had a complete lack of understanding of basic physics. There is no free lunch in physics. Electrolysis requires that you put more energy in than you get out. Consequently, it is not useful as a local source of power in a car. Maybe, where energy is readily and cheaply available, such as a hydro-electric plant, it might have some limited application for producing hydrogen for hydrogen-powered cars, if we ever get a hydrogen infrastructure established, as they are trying to do in China, but presently it is worthless for powering vehicles. You can't have a device that splits water into hydrogen and oxygen built into a car, and get more energy out of it than you put into it to get the hydrogen and oxygen to drive the car.
Now ask yourself who would ever want this man dead? Such a valuable invention and world changing technology. Must be a hoax, please look the other way, this couldn't be so.
Germ22 ago
water powered.. like a steam engine?
rickybobnby11 ago
there was a dude i saw who had a water powered bike, im skeptical but it looked real, he poured water into the tamk and was driving around.
ardvarcus ago
The only way anyone could possibly believe in the "water-powered car" nonsense is if they had a complete lack of understanding of basic physics. There is no free lunch in physics. Electrolysis requires that you put more energy in than you get out. Consequently, it is not useful as a local source of power in a car. Maybe, where energy is readily and cheaply available, such as a hydro-electric plant, it might have some limited application for producing hydrogen for hydrogen-powered cars, if we ever get a hydrogen infrastructure established, as they are trying to do in China, but presently it is worthless for powering vehicles. You can't have a device that splits water into hydrogen and oxygen built into a car, and get more energy out of it than you put into it to get the hydrogen and oxygen to drive the car.
Phantom42 ago
Understanding of physics largely shifted toward the theories (((Einstein))) held, rather than Tesla.
To put it very simply, our understanding of physics is "gravity-based". Tesla's was "wave, vibration, electric-based".
That's the simple way to put it.
glennvtx ago
There was no water powered car.
NOT_TALLEST_SKIL ago
Mourad? House of Saud? Fat American jews?
Qsnoop ago
Now ask yourself who would ever want this man dead? Such a valuable invention and world changing technology. Must be a hoax, please look the other way, this couldn't be so.
Scablifter ago
You can buy his invention on eBay look for HHO kits. Build one yerself.
He was killed to stop knowledge of the circuitry he invented for this becoming public, not for his anhydrous fuel cell.