Probably not. Red Flag "laws" trample due process so already violate the constitution, why would they stop when they lead with punishment without trial?
In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the state and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for his defense.
Rule of law: Schiff changed all the procedures for impeachment while conducting his investigation
Free Speech: The news, the pools, the D voters, and the politicians all are fine with censorship. They want any opinion they don't approve of silenced, the younger D voters want criminal penalties for "wrong-speech."
Right to Bear Arms: "Nobody should ever own any gun for any reason" I've been told this to my face so many times I don't even talk to liberals anymore.
Right to Due Process: Libs love their guilty until proven innocent. Even more so their #metoo culture is convicted guilty upon accusation, no trial needed. They are an emotional lych mob with a thirst for blood. They want the courts to reflect their mentality: punishment upon accusation with the now punished to have to prove their innocence and petition to repeal the punishment with the punishment remaining forever on the person's record all without a shred of due process, the very foundation of Rule of Law.
Honestly, even the Soviets and Stazi had due process. Modern liberals are horrible, they will usher in an era of tyranny the likes history has never seen if they are allowed to have their way. After all they exist in 100% emotion-based reasoning. Even monsters like Stalin or Mao had a logic of why they operated, they didn't do so arbitrarily based entirely on their mood swings.
view the rest of the comments →
SmackNotes ago
Do you get to face your accuser in red flag situations?
xzars_folly ago
Probably not. Red Flag "laws" trample due process so already violate the constitution, why would they stop when they lead with punishment without trial?
offender ago
Sounds just a bit unconstitutional
xzars_folly ago
Well the modern dems want to abolish:
Rule of law: Schiff changed all the procedures for impeachment while conducting his investigation
Free Speech: The news, the pools, the D voters, and the politicians all are fine with censorship. They want any opinion they don't approve of silenced, the younger D voters want criminal penalties for "wrong-speech."
Right to Bear Arms: "Nobody should ever own any gun for any reason" I've been told this to my face so many times I don't even talk to liberals anymore.
Right to Due Process: Libs love their guilty until proven innocent. Even more so their #metoo culture is convicted guilty upon accusation, no trial needed. They are an emotional lych mob with a thirst for blood. They want the courts to reflect their mentality: punishment upon accusation with the now punished to have to prove their innocence and petition to repeal the punishment with the punishment remaining forever on the person's record all without a shred of due process, the very foundation of Rule of Law.
Honestly, even the Soviets and Stazi had due process. Modern liberals are horrible, they will usher in an era of tyranny the likes history has never seen if they are allowed to have their way. After all they exist in 100% emotion-based reasoning. Even monsters like Stalin or Mao had a logic of why they operated, they didn't do so arbitrarily based entirely on their mood swings.