I don't think they are the old to be honest, I think they were built within the last couple hundred years, just like Stonehenge, it got built in the fifteys , all of our history books are nothing but lies
They just didn't USE the wheel yet, because wheels aren;t the greatest way to travel in sand and mud.
Take your sedan out into some sand dunes or go mudding in it. Or just try filling up a wheelbarrow with bricks and then try pushing it through wet mud or a kids sandbox.
It's why we today don;t use wheeled vehicles in tractionaless terrain - we use tracked vehicles or sleds. The coefficient of friction is too small for wheels in those types of environments.
The point is that their level of tech at the time proves that they didn't have the engineering capability or knowledge to build the greatest engineering feat ever created.
I don;t think "tech" and "engineering" are as closely related as you say, in order to use the term "proves."
One can be highly functional in math and engineering without having to have the technological advances. Technology, imo, builds on other technologies and knowledges, and flows from one discovery/advancement to another. For example, the incandescent lightbulb didn't just pop into existence. First we had to understand how to produce a steady flow of electricity. To do that, we had to understand capacitors and resistors. To do that we had to understand which materials had the correct amount of resistance and flow. To do that we had to be able to measure the electric flow. To do that... the list could go on for miles.
When it comes to simply mental functions, there is nothing the ancients didn't have that we have, excepting computers for advanced modeling and sheer processing power. They had roughly the same physiology as us, the same brain capacity and ability to use it. They were just missing eons of experimentation and knowledge to advance the technology. They were fantastically adept at measuring angles and putting into practice the mathematical arts. The only technology they needed was the concept of the lever. Once you have that, you have the counterbalance, and voila!, you have the pyramids. (Well, that and a LOT of labor!!)
I think many times we forget that not having technology doesn't mean stupid and ignorant.
Read Chris Massey's The Pyramids of Egypt to understand how they were built. It is written from an engineer and stone mason's perspective and takes out most of the mystery of their construction. What is still a mystery is the advanced mathematical and astronomical awareness inherent in the pyramids that align all over the world. There is a superb French Youtube video on this called something like The Confessions of the Pyramids or the Conspiracy of the Pyramids. I forget the exact name. Ming blowing show about how many of the massive stone structures around the world are aligned.
Well, ya got me there. I'll reverse myself and say this sub is appropriate. I'll agree that it's definitely a conspiracy, especially when one considers how such esteemed establishment institutions as the Smithsonian has destroyed artifacts in order to maintain the Beringia paradigm. Tons of artifacts removed from American mounds across the American midwest were sent to the museum in the 1800s. They were eventually collected and towed to sea in barges and dumped. True story.
I have that book, but I haven't read it yet. If you get to it before I do, let me know what you think. The evidence of a race of giants in America is overwhelming, from Indian lore to artifacts to enormous skeletons. People have found skulls that can fit over a man's head, and most of them have two or even three rows of teeth. When they find well preserved skulls with hair, it's always red.
I was talking to a dentist aquintance recently about wisdom and he mentioned that some people and I quote
Have 4,5,6, 7 wisdom teeth it's just a luck of the draw
Which blew me away. I have a theory that wisdom teeth and those who have more than 4 have left over genetics from the ancient giants. Because wisdom teeth simply don't make sense @threesevens
What the fuck are you talking about. Have you ever met an Egyptian that said "my ancestors built the pyramids?" Have you ever met an Egyptian? Seriously, you seem to be arguing with figments of your imagination.
Greek fire, Univeral Antidote, flexible glass, heat Ray weapons, it's theorized that Egyptians had wireless electricity that used the gold capstones on the pyramids as a conduit. There are glyphs of lightbulbs and flying crafts. Someone kept lots of history and technological advances from the public and only the elitists know of it. We certainly didn't come from rocks. There was even nanotechnology in ancient Greece. If anything we had advanced knowledge back then and then we had the dark ages. Now we are fed lies and kept in the dark about the true history of the world.
For one, we can't build a pyramid with the same precision as they have and also the stones were so perfectly placed together that a piece of paper cannot be placed between them. They were also built directly under certain stars in the sky. Each stone weighs tons of pounds.
Have you ever heard of the coral castle in Florida. A guy built that by himself. I saw a video online of a guy moving these huge stones alone it was all about balancing them. That changed my perspective on such things
I think he used sound waves or a frequency to some how to manipulate matter. I'm sure the Egyptians did the same. I am familiar with the story but I don't think civilians were let into how it was done.
No one knows how he moved them. He claimed it was reverse magnetism or some supernatural ability. A few teenagers claimed to have witnessed his work, reporting that he had caused the blocks of coral to move like hydrogen balloons.
Edward Leedskalnin. He was a Finnish immigrant who built them using very simple principles, such as levers and pivots. There's a fellow named Wally Wallington who built a scale model of Stonehenge using cement blocks he cast and erected them by himself using the same methods.
That's what he goes by. I guess "Wally" is a nickname. But do a search for the man and you'll find videos of him lifting and moving enormous objects. He even moved a barn by himself.
Evolution is saying that things become bigger and better as time goes on. The creation improves itself. If we came from " monkeys" then why were there Giants? Read about the " Golden Age". Then get back to me.
Keep speaking so anyone who knows of the subject can see how retarded you are. Just curious, would you mind giving your credentials on the subject? Dont dox yourself or anything but I am curious at where you may be getting these ideas
A dog will always give birth to a dog. A dog is a kind of animal. Then there are things like Gene variations which can produce different traits in dogs.But there is no way that a dog used to be an earthworm. DNA is so sensitive that the slightest Gene mutation or absence of a Gene can cause death or extreme deformity. Darwin had children with his cousin. All of them were either helplessly retarded or died. You going to trust in his " revelations"?
The thing that convinced Darwin of the theory of evolution was his witness to the miniscule difference of Finch beaks during different seasons. That's called micro evolution. Tell me. Are fissiles dated by the rock in which they are found or are rocks dated by the fossils that are found within them?
Mutations never add complexity to DNA, they only break something. This has been proven in the latest science. It is just one fact that disproves macro-evolution. Read Darwin Devolves.
No, it's not. How can a process like macro evo be disproven..If anything, it is more that our limited language fails to properly describe the mechanisms we are observing. Telling me to read a book like that is just like dropping a link to a Dawkins book; its insulting and condescending and ultimately just highlights how little you study or understand of the topic.
In your mind, what is a mutation? What about a species? My argument is that the idea of a species that everyone uses is retarded, and that the idea itself of species is retarded.
Do you know what hox Genes are?
As a side note, I dont get why it's cool here to attack evo, as it fits in with all religions in my mind. I feel like most people critical of evo have a mr garrison type of understanding of its processes.
For instance, which principle of natural selection do you disagree with?
I don't give a shit about religion, I care about the truth. There are major problems with the theory and I just pointed out one problem, which is clearly laid out in a modern book. If you are insulted when being confronted with information that you don't like that's your fucking problem.
No, you faggot. I'm not insulted, I just dont take some one serious who cant answer questions about the subject matter at hand.
We are here, you are the fsggot making a claim. Telling me to go read something is not an argument nor does it validate your retards understanding of evo.
I provided hinge points to argue about, you told me to read a book focusing on points that I dont agree with. Do you see what I'm saying you nigger???
You've done nothing and added nothing to the conversation other than waste your and my time. I wonder if faggots like you are even aware that's what you're doing or it's just natural.
No. We just don't have a reason to. We have cranes and every big mover today and it's cost an absolute fortune, just like it did back then. Who wants to waste their money on that? It's a giant pile of rocks.
Apparently you are not aware of the mathematical precision of how it was built, why it was built the way it was and why the location it was built in matters. Read about the pyramids before commenting. There's more to the story than the fake slaves built it bullshit.
There is no way we could build the Great Pyramid today. If you think so you are unaware of the facts about the Great Pyramid and how ridiculous the engineering is.
They weren't slaves. Slaves didn't build the pyramids. It was civil servants working to pay taxes of I recall correctly. And if the largest was 80 tons that doesn't mean every stone was 80 tons. They were quarried fairly locally as well. We move mountains with modern equipment. Stone blocks are child's play.
All I know is that the Egyptians didn't build it with slaves and copper tools. There must have been an older advanced civilization that was wiped out. Our modern history is actually the history of a reboot of civilization after some catastrophe about 12k years ago. As Graham Hancock says, we are a species with amnesia.
RageAgainstTheAmish ago
The egyptians inherited these buildings from the annunaki
Monkeyshinerbot3000 ago
Those chariots were sleds???
JohnConnor ago
I don't think they are the old to be honest, I think they were built within the last couple hundred years, just like Stonehenge, it got built in the fifteys , all of our history books are nothing but lies
VicariousJambi ago
Something interesting
https://www.lawofone.info/results.php?c=Pyramids&su=General#General
cyclops1771 ago
They just didn't USE the wheel yet, because wheels aren;t the greatest way to travel in sand and mud.
Take your sedan out into some sand dunes or go mudding in it. Or just try filling up a wheelbarrow with bricks and then try pushing it through wet mud or a kids sandbox.
It's why we today don;t use wheeled vehicles in tractionaless terrain - we use tracked vehicles or sleds. The coefficient of friction is too small for wheels in those types of environments.
threesevens ago
The point is that their level of tech at the time proves that they didn't have the engineering capability or knowledge to build the greatest engineering feat ever created.
cyclops1771 ago
I don;t think "tech" and "engineering" are as closely related as you say, in order to use the term "proves."
One can be highly functional in math and engineering without having to have the technological advances. Technology, imo, builds on other technologies and knowledges, and flows from one discovery/advancement to another. For example, the incandescent lightbulb didn't just pop into existence. First we had to understand how to produce a steady flow of electricity. To do that, we had to understand capacitors and resistors. To do that we had to understand which materials had the correct amount of resistance and flow. To do that we had to be able to measure the electric flow. To do that... the list could go on for miles.
When it comes to simply mental functions, there is nothing the ancients didn't have that we have, excepting computers for advanced modeling and sheer processing power. They had roughly the same physiology as us, the same brain capacity and ability to use it. They were just missing eons of experimentation and knowledge to advance the technology. They were fantastically adept at measuring angles and putting into practice the mathematical arts. The only technology they needed was the concept of the lever. Once you have that, you have the counterbalance, and voila!, you have the pyramids. (Well, that and a LOT of labor!!)
I think many times we forget that not having technology doesn't mean stupid and ignorant.
BagofLies ago
E
Leonidas4Q ago
Read Chris Massey's The Pyramids of Egypt to understand how they were built. It is written from an engineer and stone mason's perspective and takes out most of the mystery of their construction. What is still a mystery is the advanced mathematical and astronomical awareness inherent in the pyramids that align all over the world. There is a superb French Youtube video on this called something like The Confessions of the Pyramids or the Conspiracy of the Pyramids. I forget the exact name. Ming blowing show about how many of the massive stone structures around the world are aligned.
VicariousJambi ago
Did he figure out what material the mortar is?
Leonidas4Q ago
I don't recall. I do know that the motar used in China's Great Wall was sweet rice.
Shitt1ngMys3lf ago
The Revelation Of The Pyramids?
https://invidio.us/watch?v=2fS9ixfQ_no
Leonidas4Q ago
YES, The Revelation of the Pyramids, quite an eye opening show.
Shitt1ngMys3lf ago
A lot of the information presented I was already aware of but it was definitely worth the watch.
Dsonophorus ago
World is wiggly lately. Shit used to do a better job of staying the way it is back when it had 4 sides.
realmonster ago
daaaayum, thems was some math ass niggas n shit.
TrialsAndTribulation ago
This is very interesting, but I don't know why it's posted under v/conspiracy. This is science and engineering, not conspiracy.
threesevens ago
The conspiracy is that our history is wrong and being purposefully withheld from us.
TrialsAndTribulation ago
Well, ya got me there. I'll reverse myself and say this sub is appropriate. I'll agree that it's definitely a conspiracy, especially when one considers how such esteemed establishment institutions as the Smithsonian has destroyed artifacts in order to maintain the Beringia paradigm. Tons of artifacts removed from American mounds across the American midwest were sent to the museum in the 1800s. They were eventually collected and towed to sea in barges and dumped. True story.
threesevens ago
You made me curious so I looked up the Smithsonian hiding artifacts and found this.
Then I found this book: The Ancient Giants Who Ruled America: The Missing Skeletons and the Great Smithsonian Cover-Up
wtf. It is insane how much they have hidden from us.
TrialsAndTribulation ago
I have that book, but I haven't read it yet. If you get to it before I do, let me know what you think. The evidence of a race of giants in America is overwhelming, from Indian lore to artifacts to enormous skeletons. People have found skulls that can fit over a man's head, and most of them have two or even three rows of teeth. When they find well preserved skulls with hair, it's always red.
Native ago
I was talking to a dentist aquintance recently about wisdom and he mentioned that some people and I quote
Which blew me away. I have a theory that wisdom teeth and those who have more than 4 have left over genetics from the ancient giants. Because wisdom teeth simply don't make sense @threesevens
itsALWAYStheBANKERS ago
Kangz
AdmiralEnchilada ago
They built it, but it was designed by the last of the civilizations before the younger dryas catastrophe.
SumerBreeze ago
No - DNA tests of munmies show the rulers of Egypt were not related.
AdmiralEnchilada ago
You realize this supports what i said, no?
cattarhero ago
Yeah, all I have to say to the Egyptians who insist that their ancestors built the pyramids, OK, prove it, build another one!
Osmanthus ago
What the fuck are you talking about. Have you ever met an Egyptian that said "my ancestors built the pyramids?" Have you ever met an Egyptian? Seriously, you seem to be arguing with figments of your imagination.
madhatter67 ago
try telling Zahi Hawass that
DillHoleBagHands ago
Hawass is a fat slob and a fraud.
Wynterwhisper ago
The Egyptians had technology that cannot be replicated today. Or at least knowledge of superior technology. Evolution is a lie from the devil's mouth.
RobintheDungGatherer ago
Like what?
Wynterwhisper ago
Greek fire, Univeral Antidote, flexible glass, heat Ray weapons, it's theorized that Egyptians had wireless electricity that used the gold capstones on the pyramids as a conduit. There are glyphs of lightbulbs and flying crafts. Someone kept lots of history and technological advances from the public and only the elitists know of it. We certainly didn't come from rocks. There was even nanotechnology in ancient Greece. If anything we had advanced knowledge back then and then we had the dark ages. Now we are fed lies and kept in the dark about the true history of the world.
Wynterwhisper ago
For one, we can't build a pyramid with the same precision as they have and also the stones were so perfectly placed together that a piece of paper cannot be placed between them. They were also built directly under certain stars in the sky. Each stone weighs tons of pounds.
gosso920 ago
aLiEn TeChNoLoGy.
Heer_me_roar ago
You are vastly underestimating slavery and a narcissistic god-king
Wynterwhisper ago
You think slaves built the pyramids? Lmao.
Maroonsaint ago
Have you ever heard of the coral castle in Florida. A guy built that by himself. I saw a video online of a guy moving these huge stones alone it was all about balancing them. That changed my perspective on such things
Native ago
Can he move 100 TONNES???
Because that's how big the Great Pyramid stones are.
Wynterwhisper ago
I think he used sound waves or a frequency to some how to manipulate matter. I'm sure the Egyptians did the same. I am familiar with the story but I don't think civilians were let into how it was done.
threesevens ago
No one knows how he moved them. He claimed it was reverse magnetism or some supernatural ability. A few teenagers claimed to have witnessed his work, reporting that he had caused the blocks of coral to move like hydrogen balloons.
Maroonsaint ago
Well I don’t believe in Magic and that sounds like magic
threesevens ago
Or just a process we don't understand yet. Do you think we already know everything and science will not advance any further?
TrialsAndTribulation ago
Edward Leedskalnin. He was a Finnish immigrant who built them using very simple principles, such as levers and pivots. There's a fellow named Wally Wallington who built a scale model of Stonehenge using cement blocks he cast and erected them by himself using the same methods.
Maroonsaint ago
Wally wallington. You made that name Uppy uppington
TrialsAndTribulation ago
That's what he goes by. I guess "Wally" is a nickname. But do a search for the man and you'll find videos of him lifting and moving enormous objects. He even moved a barn by himself.
BearDolphin1488 ago
.. how does that disprove evo tbeory you retard faggot
Wynterwhisper ago
Evolution is saying that things become bigger and better as time goes on. The creation improves itself. If we came from " monkeys" then why were there Giants? Read about the " Golden Age". Then get back to me.
BearDolphin1488 ago
No, it's not. So frustrating. You're a faggot liar
I dont want to believe you're this fucking stupid.. but here we are.
So basically, you believe this is evo?
https://youtu.be/BL9S-TUikfg
Wynterwhisper ago
We have never witnessed evolution. Not macro evolution. I bet you think whales used to be cows too.
BearDolphin1488 ago
Keep speaking so anyone who knows of the subject can see how retarded you are. Just curious, would you mind giving your credentials on the subject? Dont dox yourself or anything but I am curious at where you may be getting these ideas
Wynterwhisper ago
A dog will always give birth to a dog. A dog is a kind of animal. Then there are things like Gene variations which can produce different traits in dogs.But there is no way that a dog used to be an earthworm. DNA is so sensitive that the slightest Gene mutation or absence of a Gene can cause death or extreme deformity. Darwin had children with his cousin. All of them were either helplessly retarded or died. You going to trust in his " revelations"?
The thing that convinced Darwin of the theory of evolution was his witness to the miniscule difference of Finch beaks during different seasons. That's called micro evolution. Tell me. Are fissiles dated by the rock in which they are found or are rocks dated by the fossils that are found within them?
threesevens ago
Mutations never add complexity to DNA, they only break something. This has been proven in the latest science. It is just one fact that disproves macro-evolution. Read Darwin Devolves.
BearDolphin1488 ago
No, it's not. How can a process like macro evo be disproven..If anything, it is more that our limited language fails to properly describe the mechanisms we are observing. Telling me to read a book like that is just like dropping a link to a Dawkins book; its insulting and condescending and ultimately just highlights how little you study or understand of the topic.
In your mind, what is a mutation? What about a species? My argument is that the idea of a species that everyone uses is retarded, and that the idea itself of species is retarded.
Do you know what hox Genes are?
As a side note, I dont get why it's cool here to attack evo, as it fits in with all religions in my mind. I feel like most people critical of evo have a mr garrison type of understanding of its processes.
For instance, which principle of natural selection do you disagree with?
threesevens ago
I don't give a shit about religion, I care about the truth. There are major problems with the theory and I just pointed out one problem, which is clearly laid out in a modern book. If you are insulted when being confronted with information that you don't like that's your fucking problem.
BearDolphin1488 ago
No, you faggot. I'm not insulted, I just dont take some one serious who cant answer questions about the subject matter at hand.
We are here, you are the fsggot making a claim. Telling me to go read something is not an argument nor does it validate your retards understanding of evo.
I provided hinge points to argue about, you told me to read a book focusing on points that I dont agree with. Do you see what I'm saying you nigger???
You've done nothing and added nothing to the conversation other than waste your and my time. I wonder if faggots like you are even aware that's what you're doing or it's just natural.
Tb0n3 ago
No. We just don't have a reason to. We have cranes and every big mover today and it's cost an absolute fortune, just like it did back then. Who wants to waste their money on that? It's a giant pile of rocks.
Wynterwhisper ago
Apparently you are not aware of the mathematical precision of how it was built, why it was built the way it was and why the location it was built in matters. Read about the pyramids before commenting. There's more to the story than the fake slaves built it bullshit.
Tb0n3 ago
What. You got some numerology bullshit?
threesevens ago
There is no way we could build the Great Pyramid today. If you think so you are unaware of the facts about the Great Pyramid and how ridiculous the engineering is.
itsALWAYStheBANKERS ago
And the slaves were Jews so I'm sure they didn't work very hard and stumk and we're lousy
binrobinro ago
"stumk and we're lousy" Stumk and we are lousy?
Well said.
itsALWAYStheBANKERS ago
You're an igger
binrobinro ago
I wuz Kangs.
Tb0n3 ago
They weren't slaves. Slaves didn't build the pyramids. It was civil servants working to pay taxes of I recall correctly. And if the largest was 80 tons that doesn't mean every stone was 80 tons. They were quarried fairly locally as well. We move mountains with modern equipment. Stone blocks are child's play.
threesevens ago
So you think they were capable to quarry, shape, move and place 315 stone blocks a day? One every two minutes?
Tb0n3 ago
It's amazing what working for your God King does for motivation. What's your more plausible explanation, aliens?
threesevens ago
All I know is that the Egyptians didn't build it with slaves and copper tools. There must have been an older advanced civilization that was wiped out. Our modern history is actually the history of a reboot of civilization after some catastrophe about 12k years ago. As Graham Hancock says, we are a species with amnesia.
Maroonsaint ago
It’s a cool ass pile of rocks you dork
Enok-Stroth ago
they didn't build it
SumerBreeze ago
It was designed by an entirely different people than those that live in Egypt today.
Aw88 ago
They said they found it
jack-in-the-crack ago
Really? Do you have a source? Something I can read or watch
Aw88 ago
John Anthony West
The_Exodite ago
To get you started, look up Graham Hancock. Also there's a great channel called UnchartedX worth a watch. I'd link but I'm on my phone.