None | We Have No Reason to Believe 5G Is Safe - Scientific American Blog Network
'Since 5G is a new technology, there is no research on health effects, so we are “flying blind” to quote a U.S. senator. '
'Meanwhile, we are seeing increases in certain types of head and neck tumors in tumor registries, which may be at least partially attributable to the proliferation of cell phone radiation. '
'The chairman of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) recently announced through a press release that the commission will soon reaffirm the radio frequency radiation (RFR) exposure limits that the FCC adopted in the late 1990s. '
'New exposure limits are needed which account for these differential effects. '
'The Ramazzini Institute in Italy replicated the key finding of the NTP using a different carrier frequency and much weaker exposure to cell phone radiation over the life of the rats. '
view the rest of the comments →
derram ago
https://unvis.it/https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/observations/we-have-no-reason-to-believe-5g-is-safe/ :
'Since 5G is a new technology, there is no research on health effects, so we are “flying blind” to quote a U.S. senator. '
'Meanwhile, we are seeing increases in certain types of head and neck tumors in tumor registries, which may be at least partially attributable to the proliferation of cell phone radiation. '
'The chairman of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) recently announced through a press release that the commission will soon reaffirm the radio frequency radiation (RFR) exposure limits that the FCC adopted in the late 1990s. '
'New exposure limits are needed which account for these differential effects. '
'The Ramazzini Institute in Italy replicated the key finding of the NTP using a different carrier frequency and much weaker exposure to cell phone radiation over the life of the rats. '
This has been an automated message.