My understanding is Phil Schneider met a very sticky end, allegedly because he had spilled the beans re the extent of tunneling going on underground in the Lower 48, could be because he was talking nukes at OKC as well.
Is it more likely that hypothetical super miniaturized nuclear weapons were used to attack the federal building, or that an easily available and dirt cheap chemical explosive was used?
Is it more likely that a conspiracy to plant micronukes was enacted by members of the federal government with no leaks or whistleblowers whatsoever, or that at most, McVeigh was a patsy?
TheRemixIgnition ago
Phil Schneider (in 1996) and Dimitri Khalezov (in 2010) also both point out that mini nukes were responsible for this.
MartinTimothy ago
sheasie ago
Reminds me of (((9/11 and Fukishima))).
AnonTruthHurts ago
They could have stole a couple computers, but no! Let’s nuke the place instead. Come on man.
Fambida ago
Lets play a game called Which Is More Likely.
Is it more likely that hypothetical super miniaturized nuclear weapons were used to attack the federal building, or that an easily available and dirt cheap chemical explosive was used?
Is it more likely that a conspiracy to plant micronukes was enacted by members of the federal government with no leaks or whistleblowers whatsoever, or that at most, McVeigh was a patsy?
Jimmycog ago
There was evidence in that building it had to go, the rest is a historical lie
MartinTimothy ago
tom9152 ago
How do you explain McVeighs' interviews?