Yep. I've said the same on here before. It's a way to make actual conspiracies appear ridiculous by association, just as you suggest. A conspiracy has to become a "conspiracy theory" to make it lose its power. The more absurd ones they can flood us with the better this ability is. If out of every ten Conspiracy theories there is one genuine conspiracy, then a casual observer will say they're all ridiculous and cease any interest in them. And that's controlling the narrative.
Haven't I? That's interesting, I would have thought that I would have done at some point. I'm interested as to why you've gone on the attack from what I've wrote though, any reason for that? Did I say something you didn't like? Is there something wrong in saying "actual conspiracies"?
You can’t immediately answer whether we landed on the moon? Just trying to sort out the wheat from the chaff here.
Typically, in my experience here and on Reddit, those who assert that Flat Earth is some kind of op intended to discredit “genuine conspiracy” theories...... don’t usually believe in really any conspiracies at all.
And of course, belief in the Apollo moon missions pre-disqualifies one from a credible opinion on Flat Earth.
Okay. No, I don't believe the Apollo 11 moon landing was legitimate. I don't believe the official story about 9/11. I don't believe WW2 and all that came with it happened the way we were told. I don't believe that JFK was assassinated by Lee Harvey Oswald alone, and many more...
So, do I pass as Wheat in your world, or am I just the humble chaff?
view the rest of the comments →
Yuke ago
Yep. I've said the same on here before. It's a way to make actual conspiracies appear ridiculous by association, just as you suggest. A conspiracy has to become a "conspiracy theory" to make it lose its power. The more absurd ones they can flood us with the better this ability is. If out of every ten Conspiracy theories there is one genuine conspiracy, then a casual observer will say they're all ridiculous and cease any interest in them. And that's controlling the narrative.
blackguard19 ago
You’ve never posted to this conspiracy forum. Let me guess, the Apollo moon landings were real too?
Yuke ago
Haven't I? That's interesting, I would have thought that I would have done at some point. I'm interested as to why you've gone on the attack from what I've wrote though, any reason for that? Did I say something you didn't like? Is there something wrong in saying "actual conspiracies"?
blackguard19 ago
You can’t immediately answer whether we landed on the moon? Just trying to sort out the wheat from the chaff here.
Typically, in my experience here and on Reddit, those who assert that Flat Earth is some kind of op intended to discredit “genuine conspiracy” theories...... don’t usually believe in really any conspiracies at all.
And of course, belief in the Apollo moon missions pre-disqualifies one from a credible opinion on Flat Earth.
Yuke ago
Okay. No, I don't believe the Apollo 11 moon landing was legitimate. I don't believe the official story about 9/11. I don't believe WW2 and all that came with it happened the way we were told. I don't believe that JFK was assassinated by Lee Harvey Oswald alone, and many more...
So, do I pass as Wheat in your world, or am I just the humble chaff?