And if not, why are you not out on normie Voat in full force spreading the message of fakery to poor souls who view the moon landings as a source of national or ethnic pride?
I’d like to know everyone’s favorite argument for the moon landing hoaxes.
If I had to pick one, other than the unassailable and eternally damning observation that none of the photos contain stars, mine comes from the move What Happened on the Moon, in which they contrast the sounds from a bobsled team on a practice run with the chatter during the touchdown of Apollo 11. In the bobsled video, you can hear the nervous adrenaline in the men’s quavering voices as well as the vibrations of the sled racing across the ice. Meanwhile, the Apollo astronauts, though using an engine that had literally never been tested, landing a craft that had literally never been landed successfully (and in fact crashed every time on earth), performing the most complex and challenging aeronautic feat in human history, a quarter million miles from home with no chance of rescue, with a myriad of catastrophes that could occur at any moment leading to sudden or horrific death, with (as one of the Apollo astronauts estimated) only a 50% chance of landing successfully, dwindling fuel supply, sound like two casual buffoons parking their car at Wal Mart. And of course you can’t hear the engine firing or any other sound. In fact I always encourage everyone to actually watch the original mission footage from any Apollo mission (few actually have), and notice how despite being in a constant state of peril with no chance of rescue, where the slightest mishap is fatal, they sound like a couple buddies on a fishing trip.
view the rest of the comments →
roznak ago
Why You Can't See Stars on the Moon
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3ksUQfEzMoM
blackguard19 ago
Let me guess...... camera exposure settings? Oh, never heard that lame ass excuse before!!!
Too bad according to NASA stars should easily be visible from the moon.
https://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap070621.html
And I guess despite ten manned moon missions they never once set the exposure settings to capture what would have been the most awe-inspiring stsrscape ever beheld by man.
Doesn’t matter anyway, because the cameras should not have worked anyway, and there have been so many differing accounts of astronauts and cosmonauts about whether they could see stars or just blackness that it’s obvious none of them have even been to space anyway. Never A Straight Answer, of course.
https://www.aulis.com/high_moon.htm
You just going to link to more shill crap or are you capable of formulating your own thoughts?
roznak ago
Correct exposure of the astronauts (=underexposed stars) or correct exposure of the stars (= overexposed astronauts): Choose one.
blackguard19 ago
Yeah let’s send men to the moon ten times and take over 5,700 photographs while doing so...... but fuck the stars. Who needs em. Don’t dare take a single picture of them.
carlip ago
Yes I'm sure that would make you retards believe it all.
blackguard19 ago
Uhhhh, it’s more likely that there would be no stars if the missions were fake than if they were real. That’s how inductive reasoning works. When every single bit of evidence also falls into the “more likely if fake” column, one can begin drawing a conclusion.