I'm pretty sure the US isn't behind the attacks as some sort of response would have been made by now if the US were actually setting them up.
We aren't calling for invasion or regime change. It almost seems like the US is keeping it's distance while letting everyone know what they believed happened.
The Japanese know who did it, that is what makes this so God damned funny.
The US and kike intel community do not understand how the Japanese know. This is what makes the irony palatable: The Japanese industrial espionage apparatus is very large and capable. It's why Mitsubishi is able to make a better ciwis than Raytheon. They know who gets sold what, what the problems are, and how it will most likely be used.
If the US continues to try to push a false flag, it will be leveraged against them.
All one need do in any situation such as this is to examine how the action serves one's self-interest. Japan is a large energy customer for Iran. Iran is Japan's 3rd largest energy supplier. Where is the self-interest served by attacking one's customer?
Fair enough....I guess. I doubt Iran said they didn't know....did they? I mean, they haven't admitted to doing it. So, who exactly knows Iran didn't know who they were attacking? It's more of the same. It's the same fucking MSM lying.
Regardless, show me the self interest for Iran to randomly attack oil tankers on the eve of US warhawks beating the drum of war against Iran.
Iran said if they aren't allowed to sell their oil they will prevent anyone from selling oil. The US revoked exemptions from countries we allowed to avoid sanction for buying Iranian oil. As soon as that happened oil infrastructure all over the region suddenly was getting attacked. Not just the tankers but pipelines and refining facilities as well.
Recent enough but they have done it again since then. The trigger for all this is Trump recently removed exemptions for some nations on buying Iranian oil. As soon as he did that all of a sudden oil infrastructure all over the region starts getting attacked.
Most likely neither Iran, nor the US was behind this attack. A state actor would have sunk the ship.
Two holes caused by small rockets is more likely the work of amateurs. A rogue terrorist faction (Houthi) using inadequate weapons (possibly shoulder fired rockets, from a small boat) to attack the ship, to show their love for Allah.
These amateurs tried to sink it with a mine first, but missed. Went to plan B, shot the ship with a couple of rockets, then went to recover their one mine that missed the target, and was filmed by a US drone. A rogue terrorist outfit can't afford to waste a mine, which is why they stayed to recover it.
True, but that doesn't exclude the possibility of radical Houthi splinter groups who decide to take their orders directly from Allah, instead of Iran, or other radical [non-Houthi] factions. Either way, I'm still leaning on this attack as being the work of non-state actors.
I mean if there were mines in the water there would be more and it sure would be easy to get evidence of them. As I say that YouTube and CNN has produced a super low quality video showing people by a boat that they say is evidence of mines lol.
And because you know, mines which blow up anything in the water with no designated target are a great tool.
at least the japanese only allow themselves to get suicided after they make an actual difference, like that mailman guy that shanked the commie to death.
SavageSeasons ago
I'm pretty sure the US isn't behind the attacks as some sort of response would have been made by now if the US were actually setting them up.
We aren't calling for invasion or regime change. It almost seems like the US is keeping it's distance while letting everyone know what they believed happened.
senpaithatignoresyou ago
The Japanese know who did it, that is what makes this so God damned funny.
The US and kike intel community do not understand how the Japanese know. This is what makes the irony palatable: The Japanese industrial espionage apparatus is very large and capable. It's why Mitsubishi is able to make a better ciwis than Raytheon. They know who gets sold what, what the problems are, and how it will most likely be used.
If the US continues to try to push a false flag, it will be leveraged against them.
JonReed ago
This isn't all established as fact yet. People should look into this before concluding anything
Smokybubbles ago
There is no way to know who committed the acts, or who to believe. Nothing is as it appears.
fluhthreeex ago
has the JewSA actually been in any wars that weren't for the world jewry, over false flags, or for war profiteering (economic reasons)?
Devious1 ago
When the news broke on BBC, they stated it was a misile, fake news ensued. Now he truth prevail. Good v evil. God wins.
fluhthreeex ago
just wait
ArcAngel ago
Hmmmm... didnt a certain country attack another ship to try to get us to go to war for them? OY VEY!
speedisavirus ago
No they didn't. Small rockets don't put mines on ships that we saw being removed on video
satisfyinghump ago
What exactly can be seen in that video? And HOW can you claim with confidence that this video is even from where and when they claim it is?
Planetoftheclown ago
All one need do in any situation such as this is to examine how the action serves one's self-interest. Japan is a large energy customer for Iran. Iran is Japan's 3rd largest energy supplier. Where is the self-interest served by attacking one's customer?
speedisavirus ago
The ship wasn't Japanese flagged. The idiots probably didn't realize it was Japanese
Planetoftheclown ago
Fair enough....I guess. I doubt Iran said they didn't know....did they? I mean, they haven't admitted to doing it. So, who exactly knows Iran didn't know who they were attacking? It's more of the same. It's the same fucking MSM lying.
Regardless, show me the self interest for Iran to randomly attack oil tankers on the eve of US warhawks beating the drum of war against Iran.
speedisavirus ago
Iran said if they aren't allowed to sell their oil they will prevent anyone from selling oil. The US revoked exemptions from countries we allowed to avoid sanction for buying Iranian oil. As soon as that happened oil infrastructure all over the region suddenly was getting attacked. Not just the tankers but pipelines and refining facilities as well.
Planetoftheclown ago
I'm not downvoting you. I'm genuinely interested in the topic. Since I'm not able to find such a threat from Iran, can you help me?
speedisavirus ago
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/jul/05/iran-retaliate-us-oil-threats-eu-visit-hassan-rouhani-trump
Recent enough but they have done it again since then. The trigger for all this is Trump recently removed exemptions for some nations on buying Iranian oil. As soon as he did that all of a sudden oil infrastructure all over the region starts getting attacked.
Planetoftheclown ago
Fair enough. I'm still skeptical. We're hearing of the attacks after the drums of war are beating.
NotaQjackass ago
My reseaech concludes that only Q jackasses and Evangelical end times jackasses bought the story.
fluhthreeex ago
unfortunately the number of humans who read this site is trivial in comparison to the number of people who watch MSM
VOALTRON ago
Most likely neither Iran, nor the US was behind this attack. A state actor would have sunk the ship.
Two holes caused by small rockets is more likely the work of amateurs. A rogue terrorist faction (Houthi) using inadequate weapons (possibly shoulder fired rockets, from a small boat) to attack the ship, to show their love for Allah.
These amateurs tried to sink it with a mine first, but missed. Went to plan B, shot the ship with a couple of rockets, then went to recover their one mine that missed the target, and was filmed by a US drone. A rogue terrorist outfit can't afford to waste a mine, which is why they stayed to recover it.
speedisavirus ago
Houthis are armed and take direction from Iran
VOALTRON ago
True, but that doesn't exclude the possibility of radical Houthi splinter groups who decide to take their orders directly from Allah, instead of Iran, or other radical [non-Houthi] factions. Either way, I'm still leaning on this attack as being the work of non-state actors.
speedisavirus ago
This is another possibility but Iran is still enabling as they keep arming them.
Octoclops ago
https://pics.me.me/the-jews-fear-the-samurai-7848992.png
Feldorai ago
It was likely US, done at the beck and call of Israel.
AinzOown ago
I mean if there were mines in the water there would be more and it sure would be easy to get evidence of them. As I say that YouTube and CNN has produced a super low quality video showing people by a boat that they say is evidence of mines lol.
And because you know, mines which blow up anything in the water with no designated target are a great tool.
speedisavirus ago
Because they are trying to remove a mine...
white_male30 ago
Should've sunk a Navy ship instead.
BlueDrache ago
They tried it twice.
Once with the USS Liberty.
Twice with the USS Cole.
vastrightwing ago
Ship owner to commit suicide in three... two...
Muh-Shugana ago
at least the japanese only allow themselves to get suicided after they make an actual difference, like that mailman guy that shanked the commie to death.