I have noticed that the majority of people are divided in two opposite sides, which are crearly artificial ideological dichotomies. Christians are against Jews and Muslims. Muslims are against Christians and Jews. Jews are against Cristians and Muslims. The right is against the left. The left is against the right. Only after a lot of time I was able to gather the truth together by reading all the opposite sources. I wonder if anyboody has ever wrote a book from a neutral point of view about all the bullshit? I don't know if I am a good writer, but if you are interested, I can write a book about all the bullshit from a neutral point of view.
anthonylancer ago
I understand. The people who would join emergency nation would do so voluntarily though. Its private land ownership
anthonylancer ago
It was a question you praying mantis
pizza-party-pooper-2 ago
I thought Ralph Epperson did a pretty good job in his book Conspiratorial History of America. Also, most of the books by Dave McGowan are pretty neutral.
Conspirologist ago
Thanks.
anthonylancer ago
if we both agree not to kill people do we become statist cucks
anthonylancer ago
the emergency nation seems really solid
Dsonophorus ago
By here I mean in this reality. If you consider talking about something the same as doing something.. You seem lost. Happy journey.
ADaniels ago
single celled microscopic protozoa need to eat other living nematodes to survive and vice versa, fungus and bacteria war each other in a similar manner, without these natural circles of life, food has no nutrition leeches need to suck your blood to survive, etc. the true face of man is both darkness and light at the same time, philosophy will only lead to endless contradictions, write about that...
Dsonophorus ago
I can go into more detail. Sadly, you can't go into more detail because you are larping. Get in touch with me when you are bored with larping. You will know that you have moved past it when your ideas are dichotomized meaningfully with external things in reality and they can be linked to actions. If you can't DO anything here and change anything meaningful, you aren't really here.
Dsonophorus ago
I'm not sure you will have much luck building anything if you have a preference for framing your ideas like that. Perhaps I just don't see the utility though. It seems like ultimately it will allow you to feel a certain way about things without actually changing much.
Do you expect that those ideas will help you build a machine or process? Can you explain how you use ideas like that?
Conspirologist ago
Bible was written by faggots raped in childhood. Wake the fuck up.
Time4puff ago
Are you saying you want the truth? Lol... good luck with that.
pby1000 ago
Mein Kampf.
Conspirologist ago
As far as I know, it started with Abrahamic ideologies, where people were commanded what not to eat. The Abrahamic religions were clearly made up by mentally sick people, probably people raped in childhood who became sado-masochists. The problem is that the majority of people are demented sheeple who would obey any asshole, if the asshole is seen as authoritarian.
Dsonophorus ago
This is an abstraction of that, but as such does not address specific conspiracies: https://psyarxiv.com/a7k96
I once had a group called Analytical Paraphenomenology the was focused on creating reproducible methods to organize knowledge in non reductionist domains.
I have a new place where I am looking at open ended problems with positive applications: https://wg1wga.com/Dynamic_Organizational_Analysis
The Observer Protocol problem section intersects conspiracies strongly.
I don't actually expect any useful contributions from the public, but they would be useful if they happen to happen.
Conspirologist ago
The problem with writing the solution is that the kikes will call you "Hitler" as soon as you write anything radical. My idea of a useful book is to write a complete analysis of anything already happened since 2000 years ago and let the readers decide what's the solution.