You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

Corpse_washer ago

I think reaction is a fundamentally flawed strategy. Action beats reaction every time.

Conspirologist ago

I think you mean prediction of action from degenerates.

Corpse_washer ago

You could frame it that like, yes. But it is more like reacting to something is inherently beaten by simply acting, without something you react to. For example, if a gypsy asks you for cigarettes, he is already prepared to knife you in the stomach. If you simply punch him in the face without letting him open his filthy mouth, you wont get a knife in the stomach. Could be argued that the punch is still a reactin for the gypsy coming close, i know. Maybe militarily seen, attacking holds more option than defending. Attacker chooses time,place and methods of attack. Defender has to no initiative.

Conspirologist ago

Attack and defense are equal, depending on skills. Don't forget to take your medicine.

Corpse_washer ago

They arent. Learn your history. Muslims conquested half of Europe while it was on the defense. Once Europe striked back, it all changed. Thats just one example.

Conspirologist ago

Europe reacted. It's the keyword.

Corpse_washer ago

The reaction was the defense. The action the striking back. Yes, we could play semantics all night long that the attack was the reaction to failing with the defense, but you should understand the concept already.

Conspirologist ago

This is Voat. You can say whatever you want. Even bullshit.