There is more heat retention in H20 then there is in C02. The idea that we are trapping more heat in with an increase of plant food is absurd. Also, how the fuck do you model the sun in your computer models? We haven't been around long enough to know how the damn thing works. There's been rumors swirling for awhile that the sun may not even be gaseous, but liquid. Which leads to us completely throwing out our astrophysics model of "The Big Bang."
I don't have the links on me, but there was "space video" (?) of a coronal mass ejection happening, that showed a ripple going across the surface of the sun. Much like when you drop a rock in a pond. I've been thinking about it and if the sun is more prone to behave like a plasma like liquid; then the theory of the big bang doesn't work because liquids aren't compressible.. There is obviously a lot of information that I am missing, nor have the time to look into, but if you think about it. How could a star collapse in upon itself if it can't compress it's self upon it's core to implode?
Also, we're dealing with stellar mechanics, which implies huge temperatures and pressures that push matter into weird states and abilities. Plasma, the fourth state of matter (solid, liquid, gas, plasma), is not as studied and displays very strange properties.
yes you are right, but liquids don't compress like gas does in the newtonian realm. I have took some upper level physics classes so I should of been more specific in what I was saying. Plasma does act very strangely when compared to regular matter.
view the rest of the comments →
ARsandOutdoors ago
There is more heat retention in H20 then there is in C02. The idea that we are trapping more heat in with an increase of plant food is absurd. Also, how the fuck do you model the sun in your computer models? We haven't been around long enough to know how the damn thing works. There's been rumors swirling for awhile that the sun may not even be gaseous, but liquid. Which leads to us completely throwing out our astrophysics model of "The Big Bang."
BlueDrache ago
It's neither gas, nor liquid, but plasma. A weird combination of the two.
ARsandOutdoors ago
I don't have the links on me, but there was "space video" (?) of a coronal mass ejection happening, that showed a ripple going across the surface of the sun. Much like when you drop a rock in a pond. I've been thinking about it and if the sun is more prone to behave like a plasma like liquid; then the theory of the big bang doesn't work because liquids aren't compressible.. There is obviously a lot of information that I am missing, nor have the time to look into, but if you think about it. How could a star collapse in upon itself if it can't compress it's self upon it's core to implode?
BlueDrache ago
https://www.researchgate.net/post/Are_liquids_compressible
https://www.answers.com/Q/Are_liquids_compressible
https://www.differencebetween.com/difference-between-compressible-and-vs-incompressible-fluids/
Also, we're dealing with stellar mechanics, which implies huge temperatures and pressures that push matter into weird states and abilities. Plasma, the fourth state of matter (solid, liquid, gas, plasma), is not as studied and displays very strange properties.
ARsandOutdoors ago
yes you are right, but liquids don't compress like gas does in the newtonian realm. I have took some upper level physics classes so I should of been more specific in what I was saying. Plasma does act very strangely when compared to regular matter.