Nor is lack of studies a qualification for it being dangerous.
That is not the point of the article. The industry is refusing to do ANY studies at all on specifically 5G. Would you be willing to step onto an airplane that was never tested for airworthiness?
Please explain to me your reasoning. Do you support putting possible pollutants into the environment, without any testing for safety or harm? I genuinely want to understand your thought process here.
Electromagnetic radiation exposure causes cognition deficit with mitochondrial dysfunction and activation of intrinsic pathway of apoptosis in rats: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/29872015/
There isn't. Because they're taking stuff out of context and conjecturing their ideology on top of it. This anti-5G and anti-vaxxing has become a religion at this point.
Gotta be careful around that dihydrogen monoxide. Sure there's no studies showing it's dangerous, but with a name like that you know it's just causing all kinds of cancer.
view the rest of the comments →
Tb0n3 ago
No studies show it's NOT safe.
qwop ago
Lack of studies is not a criteria for safety. What are you, a 5 year old?
BlueDrache ago
Nor is lack of studies a qualification for it being dangerous.
Show me a reputable study from something other than a fly-by-night bullshit blog conspiritard website and I'll consider it.
Until then, shut up.
qwop ago
That is not the point of the article. The industry is refusing to do ANY studies at all on specifically 5G. Would you be willing to step onto an airplane that was never tested for airworthiness?
Please explain to me your reasoning. Do you support putting possible pollutants into the environment, without any testing for safety or harm? I genuinely want to understand your thought process here.
qwop ago
Former senior toxicologist Ronald Melnick, Ph.D., from the National Institute of Health says the following:
Key findings from the $30 million NTP cell phone study:
Source:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XyrdQE503Sc
1,670 Peer-Reviewed Scientific Papers on Electromagnetic Fields and Biology or Health:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/19CbWmdGTnnW1iZ9pxlxq1ssAdYl3Eur3/view
Overview of 67 studies ranked by power density with observed effects, compared to current safety standard:
https://i.imgur.com/14uxRru.png
Some fun picks:
Effects of Cell Phone Radiofrequency Signal Exposure on Brain Glucose Metabolism:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3184892/
The human skin as a sub-THz receiver:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29459303
Electromagnetic radiation exposure causes cognition deficit with mitochondrial dysfunction and activation of intrinsic pathway of apoptosis in rats:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/29872015/
Oxidative mechanisms of biological activity of low-intensity radiofrequency radiation:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26151230
Frontal and temporal lobe Glioma rates in the UK since 1995:
https://microwavenews.com/sites/default/files/de-vocht-response.jpg
I await your response.
Tb0n3 ago
With all this cellphone usage all over the world, where is the precipitous rise of brain cancer cases in the average population?
BlueDrache ago
There isn't. Because they're taking stuff out of context and conjecturing their ideology on top of it. This anti-5G and anti-vaxxing has become a religion at this point.
DishingShitLikeA ago
Next up... Asbestos! The wonder mineral!
Tb0n3 ago
Gotta be careful around that dihydrogen monoxide. Sure there's no studies showing it's dangerous, but with a name like that you know it's just causing all kinds of cancer.
DishingShitLikeA ago
I just might drown in all the disinfo!
Tb0n3 ago
There'd have to be "info" first.
DishingShitLikeA ago
Valid