Let's look at the consistant pattern. What does MSM say about Wikileaks? What do they say about "Q"? What do they say about Trump? How do they say it? Their very remarkbly perfectyly consistant pattern of doing things the same way over and over indicates: WikiLeaks is copromised, and "Q" is legit. Just look at their body language and words and you can see the pattern. You can even see the concern in their eyes "will they believe me this time?" "Do I look sad enough to warrant some sympathy to get somone to believe us again?" Look at their body language.
view the rest of the comments →
WagonBurner ago
Let's look at the consistant pattern. What does MSM say about Wikileaks? What do they say about "Q"? What do they say about Trump? How do they say it? Their very remarkbly perfectyly consistant pattern of doing things the same way over and over indicates: WikiLeaks is copromised, and "Q" is legit. Just look at their body language and words and you can see the pattern. You can even see the concern in their eyes "will they believe me this time?" "Do I look sad enough to warrant some sympathy to get somone to believe us again?" Look at their body language.
WagonBurner ago
Even if "Q" is a larp, as long as s/he is stomping on MSM's sore dick, "Q" is the real deal 100%.