This is what I keep saying, the most convincing part of the video, is there is no evidence that anything even actually comes out of the gun, he shoots the wall at close range several times when the guy rushes him in the hallway. not a mark on the wall at all, same with the carpet in the main room, same with dozens of times that he fires into their bodies, no wounds appear or holes in their clothes, no blood spatter on the walls, no exit wounds, quite literally NO WOUNDS. no blood on the walls, and no damage to the walls or anything at all for that matter... just clean the carpets, of any spills and have the next mass....
there is no evidence that anything even actually comes out of the gun
I don't know about that. When he shoots into the pile of bodies in the corner, you can clearly see the bullets connect. Also when he changes his magazine, you can see actual metal jacket bullets in the magazine, and not blanks.
When I was in the army blanks were always color coded. This is for safety, so that nobody would confuse real bullets with blanks. So either he had acquired real looking blanks from somewhere (which of course is possible), or they were actual real bullets.
Then in the corner he shot one guy in the head, and when he comes back after the trip to the car, there is a pool of blood under the head. You can see pools of blood at a couple other places too.
I'm just stating what I see. People can draw their own conclusions, but we can't really say there is NO blood, and that there is NO evidence of anything coming out of the gun. Both of these are present in the video.
not really man, no blood like you would expect to see, splattered all over the walls etc. like I said no damage to any wall, floor, glass or anything at all. making trips to the car to allow them to open their blood props to make pools of blood doesn't excuse that the persons head would have shot blood and gore all over the wall right then and there. that didn't happen. and whatever you're saying about "you can clearly see the bullets connect? nope haven't seen a single shot make a clear connection. at all.....
You want to see splatter? The video I have is 16:55 long. At exactly 11:18 he shoots a man in the head inside the mosque. His brain, including blood and splatter fly approximately 4-5m across the carpet, leaving an enormous stain.
All it took me was about 40 minutes combing through the footage frame by frame. I don't know what all these armchair internet "analysts" have been doing. It's fucking clear as day.
yeah, so at the exact moment youre talking about first of all he had just swapped to a different magazine, there is not enough blood spatter you're way overexaggerating that. perhaps the switch of magazines was to one with paint, you claim you see the guys head get blown off, however this particular guy is wearing a white hat, and there isn't a single stain made to the hat, or entry wound. where it actually appears that he shot was about three inches in front white hat mans face, what could have been a bag of blood or something similar. even then he steps forward and you can see the exact spot he shot and whatever is left there.. you see no damage at all done to the man with the white hat. or even his hat is still perfectly white and in tact on his head..
view the rest of the comments →
Fateswebb ago
This is what I keep saying, the most convincing part of the video, is there is no evidence that anything even actually comes out of the gun, he shoots the wall at close range several times when the guy rushes him in the hallway. not a mark on the wall at all, same with the carpet in the main room, same with dozens of times that he fires into their bodies, no wounds appear or holes in their clothes, no blood spatter on the walls, no exit wounds, quite literally NO WOUNDS. no blood on the walls, and no damage to the walls or anything at all for that matter... just clean the carpets, of any spills and have the next mass....
Clearly not a real video. a clever mind fuck.
qwop ago
I don't know about that. When he shoots into the pile of bodies in the corner, you can clearly see the bullets connect. Also when he changes his magazine, you can see actual metal jacket bullets in the magazine, and not blanks.
When I was in the army blanks were always color coded. This is for safety, so that nobody would confuse real bullets with blanks. So either he had acquired real looking blanks from somewhere (which of course is possible), or they were actual real bullets.
Then in the corner he shot one guy in the head, and when he comes back after the trip to the car, there is a pool of blood under the head. You can see pools of blood at a couple other places too.
I'm just stating what I see. People can draw their own conclusions, but we can't really say there is NO blood, and that there is NO evidence of anything coming out of the gun. Both of these are present in the video.
Fateswebb ago
not really man, no blood like you would expect to see, splattered all over the walls etc. like I said no damage to any wall, floor, glass or anything at all. making trips to the car to allow them to open their blood props to make pools of blood doesn't excuse that the persons head would have shot blood and gore all over the wall right then and there. that didn't happen. and whatever you're saying about "you can clearly see the bullets connect? nope haven't seen a single shot make a clear connection. at all.....
info gathered by some mods on voat: Video “broadcast” by the “shooter” in the Christchurch, NZ mosque video shows very strong evidence that none of the victims in the main hall were shot with a with a high-velocity, small-caliber 5.56 rifle round as evidenced by Bloodstain Pattern Analysis (BPA). Background: Bloodstain Pattern Analysis (also known as Blood Spatter Analysis) is a forensic science relying heavily on ballistics, mathematics, physics, serology, hematology, materials engineering and other hard sciences. BPA recreates the actions of a shooting based on the science and data behind gunshot wounds (GSW). BPA discoveries are widely recognized as near irrefutable science in a court of law in the United States. BPA background: • https://gizmodo.com/physicists-are-sciencing-the-shit-out-of-gunshot-blood-1784548597 • http://www.forensicsciencesimplified.org/blood/principles.html • https://www.ifscolorado.com/bloodstain-pattern-analysis/ • https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352340918314689 Let’s look at some real gunshot wounds (NSFW): • Gunshot victim, unknown caliber: https://www.crime-scene-investigator.net/images-articles/computersvstrings-fig6.jpg (note volume of blood; shot pointing downward) • Wall shot: https://images.newscientist.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/10180000/gettyimages-157649729-800x533.jpg • A more horizontal shot – Note the very large drops, fast bleed out: https://66.media.tumblr.com/c5827528f2e25f808667e8fee7d71df0/tumblr_nk4maiKNkQ1u2roero1_400.jpg • Arterial spraying (lots of people shot and no spraying?): http://cristabuscheforensics.weebly.com/uploads/2/0/9/4/20946836/6902936.jpg?505 • And one last wall shot: https://media.gettyimages.com/photos/blood-staining-on-white-tiled-wall-picture-id174653420 • Note figure 2 – 30 caliber cartridge, self-inflicted. Headshots are a huge mess: https://medcraveonline.com/FRCIJ/FRCIJ-04-00117.pdf Now let’s look at some examples of BPA from the main hall in the Mosque (Linwood? if someone can fill in the name of the building, I’d be grateful): Source: https://www.bestgore.com/murder/livestream-video-deadly-shooting-attack-mosque-christchurch-new-zealand/ • @6:58: Shooter fires an almost level trajectory at 10-12 people. No blood spatter on the wall: https://files.catbox.moe/cg8yqp.GIF • @07:04: Shooter gets head/upper torso shot against the outside corner of a wall while victim moves in direction down hall. At 07:18, shooter returns past same wall and there is no blood on wall from a pointblank shot: https://files.catbox.moe/omhctd.GIF • @07:11: Shooter shines his weapon light on a victim lying facedown on the floor. Note the complete lack of blood spatter, spray or pooling from a multiple GSW: https://files.catbox.moe/fvsvhk.GIF • @07:23: Shooter returns to shooting previously shot people still in pile. Again, no blood consistent with over 100 5.56 rounds fired on 15-20 people against a white wall: https://files.catbox.moe/p62f7j.GIF There are no signs of mass pooling from multiple GSW. All of the victims are against, or within 5’ of a wall when they are shot. This is also worth a read on debunking a snuff film: http://www.alexanderjason.com/analysis-of-a-snuff-video-is-it-real In summary, there is nothing in the video to support that “victims” within this room and the hallway leading up to it were shot with a fatal weapon.
qwop ago
You want to see splatter? The video I have is 16:55 long. At exactly 11:18 he shoots a man in the head inside the mosque. His brain, including blood and splatter fly approximately 4-5m across the carpet, leaving an enormous stain.
All it took me was about 40 minutes combing through the footage frame by frame. I don't know what all these armchair internet "analysts" have been doing. It's fucking clear as day.
Fateswebb ago
yeah, so at the exact moment youre talking about first of all he had just swapped to a different magazine, there is not enough blood spatter you're way overexaggerating that. perhaps the switch of magazines was to one with paint, you claim you see the guys head get blown off, however this particular guy is wearing a white hat, and there isn't a single stain made to the hat, or entry wound. where it actually appears that he shot was about three inches in front white hat mans face, what could have been a bag of blood or something similar. even then he steps forward and you can see the exact spot he shot and whatever is left there.. you see no damage at all done to the man with the white hat. or even his hat is still perfectly white and in tact on his head..
Wolf451 ago
Great Analysis. This NZ shooting was clearly yet another hoax. People of NZ, STAND AND FIGHT for your right to bear arms.