(https://www.wnyc.org/story/review-upward-spiral-hilma-af-klint/)
**Hilma of Klint **: from wiki:
Hilma af Klint (October 26, 1862 – October 21, 1944) was a Swedish artist and mystic whose paintings were among the first abstract art.[1] A considerable body of her abstract work predates the first purely abstract compositions by Kandinsky.[2] She belonged to a group called "The Five", a circle of women who shared her belief in the importance of trying to make contact with the so-called "High Masters"—often by way of séances.[3] Her paintings, which sometimes resemble diagrams, were a visual representation of complex spiritual ideas.
(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hilma_af_Klint)
Here is one of her more famous painting "the altar" part of her "temple series"
https://media.wnyc.org/i/649/858/c/80/2018/10/pyramidcapture.JPG
her work is currently on display at the Guggenheim museum in NYC
guggenhiem video
The reoccurring theme in the videos/interviews is that none of the critics 'understand' the works. or at least they say they don't.
if you substitute the vague word "spiritualism", in the interviews and wiki summary, for the more descriptive "Luciferianism" the story becomes much more obvious. Hilma and her crew, known as the theosophical society, were Luciferians and now in keeping with the strangely predictive nature of her works we find similar symbology in popular culture.
Luis Vuitton- Bloomingdales NYC although this display's inspiration is attributed to 'the wizard of OZ' who's author mysteriously was also a member of the theosophical society.
the Luciferians has begun a cultural push, the time to usher in the NWO is at hand, some of the conduits for the push are pop-art, retail displays, music videos, billboards ect.. and once the mind is open to the notion that this symbolism is all around you, you may begin to see things differently
freedom tower
just food for thought. hope this is a high quality post
view the rest of the comments →
ardvarcus ago
Theosophists have a philosophy that is gnostic at its base. They believed that Lucifer was the Light Bringer -- that is, the angel Lucifer brought the enlightenment of spiritual knowledge, or gnosis, to mankind. They did not regard Lucifer as Satan, but thought of him more as Prometheus.
Goys-R-Us ago
This always confuses me. If Lucifer is a "light bringer" why do so many people consider that a bad thing?
ardvarcus ago
It's the same deal with Eve and the fruit from the Tree of Knowledge. Why, you might ask yourself, is attaining knowledge of good and evil a bad thing? The answer is, It isn't a bad thing, it's a good thing. The jealous God of the Old Testament didn't want mankind to achieve knowledge, because it is easier to control a race that remains ignorant of its true nature and potential. The core of Gnostic teachings is that the God of Genesis is an evil lesser being who may have created the world, but who is not the Supreme Source of all creation. The Serpent was sent by this Highest God to liberate human kind from the bondage of ignorance in the prison of the Garden. The Serpent sacrified itself for humanity, and was punished by this jealous god, just as Adam and his descendants were punished for their act of defiance.