(https://www.wnyc.org/story/review-upward-spiral-hilma-af-klint/)
**Hilma of Klint **: from wiki:
Hilma af Klint (October 26, 1862 – October 21, 1944) was a Swedish artist and mystic whose paintings were among the first abstract art.[1] A considerable body of her abstract work predates the first purely abstract compositions by Kandinsky.[2] She belonged to a group called "The Five", a circle of women who shared her belief in the importance of trying to make contact with the so-called "High Masters"—often by way of séances.[3] Her paintings, which sometimes resemble diagrams, were a visual representation of complex spiritual ideas.
(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hilma_af_Klint)
Here is one of her more famous painting "the altar" part of her "temple series"
https://media.wnyc.org/i/649/858/c/80/2018/10/pyramidcapture.JPG
her work is currently on display at the Guggenheim museum in NYC
guggenhiem video
The reoccurring theme in the videos/interviews is that none of the critics 'understand' the works. or at least they say they don't.
if you substitute the vague word "spiritualism", in the interviews and wiki summary, for the more descriptive "Luciferianism" the story becomes much more obvious. Hilma and her crew, known as the theosophical society, were Luciferians and now in keeping with the strangely predictive nature of her works we find similar symbology in popular culture.
Luis Vuitton- Bloomingdales NYC although this display's inspiration is attributed to 'the wizard of OZ' who's author mysteriously was also a member of the theosophical society.
the Luciferians has begun a cultural push, the time to usher in the NWO is at hand, some of the conduits for the push are pop-art, retail displays, music videos, billboards ect.. and once the mind is open to the notion that this symbolism is all around you, you may begin to see things differently
freedom tower
just food for thought. hope this is a high quality post
view the rest of the comments →
ardvarcus ago
Theosophists have a philosophy that is gnostic at its base. They believed that Lucifer was the Light Bringer -- that is, the angel Lucifer brought the enlightenment of spiritual knowledge, or gnosis, to mankind. They did not regard Lucifer as Satan, but thought of him more as Prometheus.
Goys-R-Us ago
This always confuses me. If Lucifer is a "light bringer" why do so many people consider that a bad thing?
GetWoke ago
Because lucifer was the 'bringer of light' before he was cast out heaven, from then on he is known as the 'prince of lies'.
Goys-R-Us ago
I need more than that. Why was he bringer of light in heaven? Why are lucifer and satan considered two different ideas/entities? There's a shit ton of history behind these concepts which is what I'd like to understand in the readers digest version.
GetWoke ago
I need more than that. Why was he bringer of light in heaven? Lucifer is purported to have been god most beautiful creation, chiefest of the arch angels Why are lucifer and satan considered two different ideas/entities? not really clear on that myself, the standard bible doesn't differentiat, supposedly the book of Enoch has more to say on it. But I'm not an expert on that :/ There's a shit ton of history behind these concepts which is what I'd like to understand in the readers digest version. not sure readers digest type summaries will do the topic justice
Goys-R-Us ago
Prolly not. I'm lazy.