A Policy for Moderators to Follow
Hi folks, Mumberthrax here. I have another boring post for you today about... Moderation Policy!
Yes that's right, another moderation policy post. I bet you're getting tired of those and want fun stuff, eh? Well if we have a good mod policy document in place, then mods will hopefully be better empowered to implement fun stuff like AMAs and quality sticky'd topic discussion posts. At least that's the supposition ; )
So I drew up this rough draft of a moderation policy document (based on the suggestions from the previous community discussions: 1, 2, 3) and ran it by the mod team for any critiques. Now we'd like to present it to the community for review.
Here it is!
https://github.com/Mumberthrax/VoatConspiracy/blob/master/ModerationPolicy.md
It is mostly common sense stuff, but I think it's important to have it laid out just so everyone is on the same page, especially for when new moderators are added. Think of it like a constitution that guides your public servants in the manner you prefer - because this document is intended to be part of our "open source" moderation project on github, where anyone may submit proposals for changes to be incorporated into it. Basically, you the community get to help shape the policy that you the community follow when you take on the role of moderator.
Your feedback is important
So if you would, take a look and share your opinion on it in the comments below. Please feel free to be as critical as you like (though offering specific suggestions for solutions is ideal!). There are a few spots where there are unanswered questions relating to the addition of new moderators - these questions are not urgent, and a community discussion on that specific topic is upcoming so they don't have to be answered just yet.
If there's no opposition to this document as it exists currently, then we'll go ahead and make it our official moderation policy for now.
Thanks for your time, and thanks for being a part of our community here at /v/conspiracy! :D
Upcoming community discussions:
-
How we select new moderators: challenges, options
-
Racism and bigotry, Conspiracy theories about specific races or peoples, and how we want to handle these things
-
Subverse rules: updates, possible additions/changes.
Some random things you may be interested in (Please accept this content as an apology for boring meta stuff!):
Edit: Yes, I unsticky'd @AssuredlyAThrowAway's post about /v/nottheonion. Yes, you're welcome to ask about it in the comments here.
view the rest of the comments →
fuckyousantorum ago
Have read it. Looks good. We're lucky to have you.
Mumberthrax ago
Thanks. I am not so proud of it - I think it could use some serious revision to make it more concise, but I think it gets the basic sentiment across: "if you're a moderator, be responsible; don't be a dumbass" :P
gabeh73 ago
how about we go meta. No mods at all. Just user voats...but make it so not all voats are equal...we also can voat on the voat power of users to some degree...so when all the people already in a forum see that some guy is a shill we can downvoat them to 1/4 power or something...never all the way to zero...just to help give a edge to those who have already proven themselves to not be shills or trolls or operation mockingbirds..and then even if a mod is show to be a shill...we shown it out in the open and we basically voat their power away.
gabeh73 ago
i finally left reddit because I couldn't comment on oddities with ISIS any more without getting banned...those mods were corrupt and nobody could do anything about it...except leave...which is what has happened.