I'm pro-vax (unlike most of the autists here want a scapegoat to blame for them being born inferior) and still oppose what Zuckerberg is doing. It's up to the public to point out misinformation and refuse to follow sources that spread it, not up to private entities who feel they can be the judge for everyone else.
if there's this much support for vaccines by the powers that be, and anti-vaxxers have so much resistance piled against them, a thinking man might wonder WHY so much effort is used to silence critics...
...And then blindly assume it's because of some complex conspiracy to cover up negative effects, while ignoring the possibility that the action was made because his shareholders bitched at him because of recent public outcry against misinformation on Facebook.
Now my opinion is fuck him either way, but let's be rational here, is it surprising that shareholders arn't happy about the bad PR from spreading misinformation? While the action is wrong, the motive makes logical sense without the need for some long-shot conspiracy.
view the rest of the comments →
theoldones ago
isnt most of his remaining userbase older, tech-illiterate anti-vaxx women?
this seems like a bad idea for him to attempt...
Cannibalguy ago
I'm pro-vax (unlike most of the autists here want a scapegoat to blame for them being born inferior) and still oppose what Zuckerberg is doing. It's up to the public to point out misinformation and refuse to follow sources that spread it, not up to private entities who feel they can be the judge for everyone else.
Fuck Facebook.
theoldones ago
if there's this much support for vaccines by the powers that be, and anti-vaxxers have so much resistance piled against them, a thinking man might wonder WHY so much effort is used to silence critics...
Cannibalguy ago
...And then blindly assume it's because of some complex conspiracy to cover up negative effects, while ignoring the possibility that the action was made because his shareholders bitched at him because of recent public outcry against misinformation on Facebook.
Now my opinion is fuck him either way, but let's be rational here, is it surprising that shareholders arn't happy about the bad PR from spreading misinformation? While the action is wrong, the motive makes logical sense without the need for some long-shot conspiracy.
theoldones ago
watcha doin there, rabbi?
Cannibalguy ago
It's almost as if Zuckerberg is jewish or something crazy like that right?