Simple math. I guess I lost you. What do you suppose the statistical chances are here of having a husband on record same name and same age. Are you able to comprehend these concepts? They are pretty simple. If his name and birthdate were on file it may have simply calculated his age overlooking that he's dead.
So you missed the point entirely. It's not pure speculation when you are looking at an obvious statistical anomaly. There is something there that should be followed up on. Pure speculation would be in the absence of such. Glad I could clear that up for you.
view the rest of the comments →
Rotteuxx ago
So you must be able to confirm she's the one and it's not a different Ruth Ginsburg.
Also there's no date on there nor a link to a verifiable source.
But regardless, her husband died in 2010 at 78 years of age you fake news slut !
Civil_Warrior ago
A simple Google of who Martin Ginsburg is will help you.
Rotteuxx ago
Which one ?
Her husband was Martin David Ginsburg, born June 10, 1932, died June 27, 2010.
Civil_Warrior ago
1932+86= Hint it's not June yet
Rotteuxx ago
What the fuck are you rambling about ?
Civil_Warrior ago
Simple math. I guess I lost you. What do you suppose the statistical chances are here of having a husband on record same name and same age. Are you able to comprehend these concepts? They are pretty simple. If his name and birthdate were on file it may have simply calculated his age overlooking that he's dead.
Rotteuxx ago
100% pure speculation
Civil_Warrior ago
So you missed the point entirely. It's not pure speculation when you are looking at an obvious statistical anomaly. There is something there that should be followed up on. Pure speculation would be in the absence of such. Glad I could clear that up for you.
Rotteuxx ago
Sure, Bub.