It was all demolition. Wasn't there a source not too long ago which was comprised of 30 or so demolition experts and companies, which examined the videos only to ALL agree is was man made explosions?
Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth, there was another group (lawyers iirc?) who were and making headway on the legal front as well... they were in the news recently as well but I didn't bother posting it here.. it's a waste of time on this controlled shit-hole of a "free speech" site--it always gets down-voted by the DoD/internet police/shill bots anyway.
I'm sure there are other independent groups and people, approaching this from all sorts of different angles to dismantle the 'official story'. They have much larger bodies of information than the linked quick intro that addresses the NIST report, highlights of the flaws in the NIST's computer simulations/models that were used to explain WTC7 as collapsing due to 'heat from being too close to the other buildings', and more.
I'm not involved in any of the projects, nor have I spent all of my free time reading through the material or watching their lectures--I'm not an architect, structural, skyscraper, or demolition engineer, so I've only seen some of it. It's there if anyone's interested though.
TONS of groups have looked into it and they all say the same exact thing about it. It had to have been a man made explosion. Theres no possible way the building could collapse in on itself like that naturally. Its just about physically impossible
view the rest of the comments →
i_scream_trucks ago
As did all of the towers.
lets_get_hyyerr ago
It was all demolition. Wasn't there a source not too long ago which was comprised of 30 or so demolition experts and companies, which examined the videos only to ALL agree is was man made explosions?
fluhthreeex ago
Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth, there was another group (lawyers iirc?) who were and making headway on the legal front as well... they were in the news recently as well but I didn't bother posting it here.. it's a waste of time on this controlled shit-hole of a "free speech" site--it always gets down-voted by the DoD/internet police/shill bots anyway.
I'm sure there are other independent groups and people, approaching this from all sorts of different angles to dismantle the 'official story'. They have much larger bodies of information than the linked quick intro that addresses the NIST report, highlights of the flaws in the NIST's computer simulations/models that were used to explain WTC7 as collapsing due to 'heat from being too close to the other buildings', and more.
I'm not involved in any of the projects, nor have I spent all of my free time reading through the material or watching their lectures--I'm not an architect, structural, skyscraper, or demolition engineer, so I've only seen some of it. It's there if anyone's interested though.
lets_get_hyyerr ago
TONS of groups have looked into it and they all say the same exact thing about it. It had to have been a man made explosion. Theres no possible way the building could collapse in on itself like that naturally. Its just about physically impossible