You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

madhatter67 ago

That article is from 2014, I'm pretty sure Brian Foerster has had more done since, and I'm pretty sure the results are still inconclusive...if they weren't I'd have remembered as I've been interested in this for many years

Interesting subject, but misleading headline

cthulian_axioms ago

Ancient Aliens did an episode last season with one of the skulls. Giorgio Tsoukalos (the guy with the hair) brought it to a forensics lab where they extracted some very, very strange DNA; they put it in an MRI machine and the person running it says, "huh, that's really weird, there's no parietal suture"; I forget if they did any more experimentation on it.

They've started doing actual science and actual journalism in the latest two seasons.

Le_Squish ago

The missing suture is what makes non human skulls stand out from those that have been modified. Anthropologist have known about such "strange" skulls for decades and haven't been allowed to discuss them.

madhatter67 ago

Yeh the missing parietal suture thing is on more than one of the Paracas skulls and very strange.....I'm no expert on DNA analysis, but the impression I get from the tests that have done is that the results are basically unclear....it could just be contamination or degradation or it could actually be from an unknown humanoid or hominid....which leaves a lot of room for interpretation!

It is well worth keeping an eye on Brian Foerster on YouTube as he is driving the whole thing with these skulls so I'm sure he will be first with any new results, though some of his views can be a bit flakey, he is also one of the best resources when it comes to ancient mysteries/architecture and he doesn't adhere too much to any one explanation

Whatever is going on with these things, it is certainly not what mainstream academia would want us to believe