Refute all of my sourced claims:
https://voat.co/v/news/2556389/12828210
The twin towers were taken out by remotely controlled aircraft and pre-placed explosives by the US government on behalf of Israel.
Edit: Proof
Dov Zakheim
https://infogalactic.com/info/Dov_S._Zakheim
He served in various Department of Defense posts during the Reagan administration, including Deputy Undersecretary of Defense for Planning and Resources from 1985 to 1987. There was some controversy in both the US and Israel over Zakheim's involvement in ending the Israeli fighter program, the IAI Lavi. He argued that Israeli and U.S. interests would be best served by having Israel purchase F-16 fighters, rather than investing in an entirely new aircraft.
Zakheim was signed a letter to Clinton about Iraq.[1][2][3] During the 2000 U.S. Presidential election campaign, Zakheim served as a foreign policy advisor to George W. Bush as part of a group led by Condoleezza Rice that called itself The Vulcans. .
From 1987–2001, Zakheim was CEO of SPC International, a subsidiary of System Planning Corporation, a high-technology analytical firm. During that period he served as a consultant to the Office of the Secretary of Defense, and sat on a number of major DoD panels, including its Task Force on Defense Reform (1997) and the DoD's first Board of Visitors of Overseas Regional Centers (1998–2001). In September 2000 Zakheim is also a member of the Council on Foreign Relations, the International Institute for Strategic Studies, and the United States Naval Institute, and a member of the editorial board of the journal The National Interest.
...He was then appointed as Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller) from 2001 in George W. Bush administration, and served in this capacity until April 2004. During his term as Comptroller, he was tasked to help track down the Pentagon's 2.3 trillion dollars' worth of unaccounted transactions.
The System Planning Corporation
https://archive.fo/NSbGo
The Flight Termination System (FTS) is a fully redundant turn-key range safety and test system for remote control and flight termination of airborne test vehicles. The FTS consists of SPC's Command Transmitter System (CTS) and custom control, interface, and monitoring subsystems. The system is fully programmable and is flexible enough to meet the changing requirements of today's modern test ranges.
Proof that the military has been using drone tech since the 40's
http://infogalactic.com/info/Operation_Aphrodite
By late 1943, General Henry H. Arnold had directed Brigadier General Grandison Gardner's electronic engineers at Eglin Field, Florida, to outfit war-weary bombers with automatic pilots so that they could be remotely controlled.[5] The plan was first proposed to Major General James H. Doolittle some time in 1944. Doolittle approved the plan for Operation Aphrodite on June 26, and assigned the 3rd Bombardment Division with preparing and flying the drone aircraft, which was to be designated BQ-7.[6] In the U.S. Navy's similar project, Operation Anvil, the drone was designated BQ-8.
http://infogalactic.com/info/Joseph_P._Kennedy_Jr.
Operation Aphrodite (US Army Air Forces) & Operation Anvil (US Navy) made use of unmanned, explosive-laden Army Air Forces Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress and Navy PB4Y-1 Liberator bombers that were deliberately crashed into their targets under radio control.
Edit: https://usatoday30.usatoday.com/tech/techreviews/2001/10/2/remote-pilot.htm
This is a scalable context timeline. It contains events related to the event August 2001: Large Passenger Jet Flown and Landed by Remote Control.
view the rest of the comments →
NevadaDesertPatriot ago
I believe that is how the cone went through the building! It wasn't a passenger plane. The passenger planes were switched in midair by swapping the radar signatures, flying over each other. Passengers were flown up to 40k ft. and decompressed, killing them all without a struggle. Planes then flown to overseas base to refuel then to Israel.
Chimaira92 ago
Thanks for the sarcastic and condescending comment.
NevadaDesertPatriot ago
What comment? Maybe you meant someone else.
Chimaira92 ago
What are you referring to? There's multiple different camera angles that showcase planes hitting the building.
The passenger planes never had to be switched out, large commercial airplanes were fitted with the remote control technology earlier in that year.
What lol
NevadaDesertPatriot ago
Are you serious? Do I have to 1) agree with you, only to have you down vote me? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yjrmx0PskNk <-- nose cone poking through bldg. 2) I saw a video, sorry I can't also provide that, that explained how remote control planes were switched midair. How else do you think the radar towers were fooled?
Chimaira92 ago
No I honestly thought you were making fun of me lol.
I see you are actually being serious so I take back the downvoat and I'll check out your claim.
NevadaDesertPatriot ago
God Bless, we all make mistakes. Anyway. The video I saw... I'll look if I archived it... talked about how it all went down. The remote control tech is real and has been. What "I" was saying, was just adding to your argument. Basically, plane "a" is the passenger plane. Plane "b" is the remote controlled plane. Plane B flies under/over plane A to make it look on radar that there is only one plane. The passenger plane A then flies (up or down...IDK), out of range of the radar. The remote control plane flies on the path and the radar assumes that the B plane is the same plane, thus fooling the radar. Then... what we see is the remote control plane hitting the bldg. That's why the cone goes all the way through, because it's not a passenger plane.
Chimaira92 ago
Ahhhh looks like i've got some more digging to do.
NevadaDesertPatriot ago
https://forbiddenknowledgetv.net/heres-what-really-happened-on-911-james-perloff/
Have you seen this? Get back to me after you've seen it.
NevadaDesertPatriot ago
I'll look and see if I can find the link Patriot
heygeorge ago
Why swap out the planes if you’re going to kill the passengers anyway? That seems like a lot of needlessly complicated effort.
NevadaDesertPatriot ago
https://forbiddenknowledgetv.net/heres-what-really-happened-on-911-james-perloff/
NevadaDesertPatriot ago
You need the remote controlled plane to fool the radar. Planes are swapped midair with that method.
heygeorge ago
No, what I don’t understand is: Why swap airplanes? Why not install the remote system in the commercial plane? If you are going to murder everyone anyway, why not just leave them on the plane then crash them into the building? Then you wouldn’t need to swap planes.
NevadaDesertPatriot ago
People are on board and the radar is following the plane of passengers. The remote controlled plane (at some point) needs to assume the radar signature. You just can't start the remote controlled plane with out passengers and pass it off. You start with the plane full of passengers and at some point have to switch in mid air. Just plain common sense.
heygeorge ago
Why not just remote control the plane with the passengers? This is what I do not understand.
NevadaDesertPatriot ago
Good Q. Because the planes look different. The planes that hit the buildings were not passenger planes. You would NOT get on a plane that wasn't a commercial passenger plane. If you couldn't get the soon to be dead passengers on a plane, you had no "story" of a hi-jacking. right? https://duckduckgo.com/?q=911+military+plane+hitting+towers&t=ffnt&iax=images&ia=images&iai=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.voltairenet.org%2Flocal%2Fcache-vignettes%2FL400xH300%2F1-3848-2-2fbd7.jpg Look at these images and tell me you'd board that to go on vacation? LOL.
heygeorge ago
Interesting. Where is that still image from? I don’t recognize it.
NevadaDesertPatriot ago
actual image of the plane hitting the tower. MSM will not show it
heygeorge ago
I just don’t remember that one. Do you know anything else about the photo?
NevadaDesertPatriot ago
I've seen a variant over time. Merely providing what I found on the internet.