You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

Hydrocephalus ago

Wait, so you're saying a politician may have been less than honest about his intentions? Right before an election, no less? Heresy!

Waiyu_Dudat ago

Monarchy now!

Phantom42 ago

National Socialism ftw.

Waiyu_Dudat ago

I don't know enough about either to really debate which one is truly preferable. I'd go for a dictatorial natsoc though I think. Arguably not much different from a monarchy. Monarchies almost always had some type of welfare state, though the church carried most of the burden. I guess that is where the differences lay, natsoc separates church and state and continues to have voting like a democracy (or republic), correct? Monarchies work closely with the church. But that's about the extent of my knowledge. I'd personally prefer pre 1054 type western monarchies, because the Catholic church sucks, or eastern monarchies.

And yeah, no doubt, Germany 34-45 was a powerhouse, but there's so little history. What other examples of natsoc can red pill me?

fastregister ago

you shouldnt vote on who governs, but vote on policy that is relevant to your occupations. it shouldnt matter who the person is that governs, he has to follow the policy at all times. a monarch could be the perfect overseer and enforcer of this policy.

Phantom42 ago

Really, if you want a look at NatSoc look only to Germany. That's about it.

They were the last truly free nation, and we killed them for it.