Just because some parents allow their children to roam freely on Twitter etc. The Tweeter Bird thinks they should police their platform so 5 yr olds won't get too educated.
The Equadorian embassy cut him off from the internet in March. His legal team took over his Twitter account since then. I don't know the circumstances of the account's recent suspension though.
Until it's codified in case law or statutory law, my argument stands as-is. No amount of temper tantrums on your end will fix it. So kindly go be a nigger somewhere else.
Twitter advertised itself as a free speech platform and it's only recent in the past couple of years where they've done a very public and obvious 180 on that.
When people typically talk about "right to free speech" in regards to other companies, they mean the spirit of the law and value to society it has, no the letter of the law to govern.
It was probably due to pressure from the Ecuadorian government. They have imposed ridiculous censorship on Assange and his colleagues lately. Read more about that here.
They're basically threatening Assange with extradition to the US or UK if his friends and colleagues convey anything journalistic that Assange himself would publish.
AssangeDefence is the account his legal team is using. No one grabbed the Assange account after the embassy blocked him from having internet. His legal team took over the Assange account when that happened.
Likely they will say it's because Julian himself doesn't run the account anymore since he was taken offline earlier in the year, and they count this as "impersonation".
No. When the embassy blocked internet for Assange, his legal team took over the account. I do not know the circumstances of the suspension but the team announced they were going to use a different account from then on.
If Julian Assange ever gets to leave that embassy,[without arrest and being thrown in jail for life] he will be hounded, harassed and followed to his death if he is not careful and takes adequate steps to keep himself alive.
Jamfer ago
Just because some parents allow their children to roam freely on Twitter etc. The Tweeter Bird thinks they should police their platform so 5 yr olds won't get too educated.
anonymiss ago
Fake news account was renamed: https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/1057725763238141952
WhyNoDonuts ago
That's the price of spreading the truth, you get shut down.
halinflorida ago
Twitter is part of the Cabal-controlled world.
PlasmaTorch ago
Twitter is for SJWs and cucks. Everyone who isn't just gets banned.
halinflorida ago
I've never used it.
naamasteer ago
Geoengineering - Weather Warfare, Chemtrails, 5G, Technocracy, IOT ... Julian Assange, Evil Smart Dust is Everywhere & in Everything https://invidio.us/watch?v=HTXWHDNW6Gc @derivauk @syndicalism @rampancylambentraven @think- @maurice
qwertyanon ago
Anti-Free Speech platform bans the worlds Biggest Free Speech Addvocate
Surprised ??
BlockMe ago
https://twitter.com/AssangeDefence
from
https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/1057725763238141952
Pcpoet09 ago
interesting its been over 9 months since the guy has even been on line correct me with hominy months if I wrong….
NeedleStack ago
The Equadorian embassy cut him off from the internet in March. His legal team took over his Twitter account since then. I don't know the circumstances of the account's recent suspension though.
https://voat.co/v/Wikileaks/2823988
https://voat.co/v/Wikileaks/2823778/14762781
RampancyLambentRaven ago
ASSHOLES ALL OF YOU ASSHOLES!
RampancyLambentRaven ago
THEY JUST BAN AND SHADOW BAN FOR NO REASON! ASSHOLES!
talmoridor-x ago
Twitter isn't a human right. Shut the fuck up and build your own network.
EIMR ago
Just like Gab! oh wait.
talmoridor-x ago
Make it more anonymous and decentralized. Have some balls and use your fucking brain.
RampancyLambentRaven ago
THEY DON'T GIVE A FUCK ABOUT YOU OR YOUR RIGHT TO FREE SPEECH!
fluhthreeex ago
GOOD. I NEED A SAFE SPACE.
BlueDrache ago
They're a private company. They don't have to.
Humansized ago
Npc reply. Good job repeating what you were told. Kys if you cant think for yourself. Muh private company smfh
Anaximandel ago
Fuck off with this reddit tier reply.
BlueDrache ago
Until it's codified in case law or statutory law, my argument stands as-is. No amount of temper tantrums on your end will fix it. So kindly go be a nigger somewhere else.
kneo24 ago
It's a Reddit tier reply for a couple of reasons.
talmoridor-x ago
Make your own platform, you fucking pussy. More government is never the answer.
Beta_Ray_Bill ago
Like gab?
talmoridor-x ago
Gab was asking for it by not being secure
BlueDrache ago
Unfortunately, the spirit of the law does not govern. The letter does.
peacegnome ago
It is also a Reddit-tier reply because it is what the npc script says. There was even an image macro here a few days ago.
RampancyLambentRaven ago
They just ban anyone on social media for the sake of banning anyone. Dude. Fuck these pussies and fuck these assholes.
madhatter67 ago
does anyone know the reason given for this? or are they not even bothering with dumb justifications anymore?
NeedleStack ago
It was probably due to pressure from the Ecuadorian government. They have imposed ridiculous censorship on Assange and his colleagues lately. Read more about that here.
They're basically threatening Assange with extradition to the US or UK if his friends and colleagues convey anything journalistic that Assange himself would publish.
Assange's Twitter account has been run by his legal defense team since the embassy cut him off from the internet and they have continued to publish what Ecuador would consider criticisms of Ecuador and its 'friendly' nations.
So I would not be surprised if the Ecuadorian government pressured Twitter to suspend the account
qwop ago
It seems it was not a ban. The explanation:
https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/1057725763238141952
NeedleStack ago
AssangeDefence is the account his legal team is using. No one grabbed the Assange account after the embassy blocked him from having internet. His legal team took over the Assange account when that happened.
https://voat.co/v/Wikileaks/2823988
https://voat.co/v/Wikileaks/2823778/14762781
Retron ago
Likely they will say it's because Julian himself doesn't run the account anymore since he was taken offline earlier in the year, and they count this as "impersonation".
NeedleStack ago
No. When the embassy blocked internet for Assange, his legal team took over the account. I do not know the circumstances of the suspension but the team announced they were going to use a different account from then on.
https://voat.co/v/Wikileaks/2823988
jollux ago
Wouldn't that argument be a little too... true?
peacegnome ago
If they want to apply that rule, where a rep can't post on your account, then just about every high profile account should be kicked
jollux ago
True, but they also aren't known for applying rules evenly.
BOILEDSWEETS ago
If Julian Assange ever gets to leave that embassy,[without arrest and being thrown in jail for life] he will be hounded, harassed and followed to his death if he is not careful and takes adequate steps to keep himself alive.
derram ago
https://archive.fo/by7qW :
This has been an automated message.