I think the biggest question is, are there people out there worth working for?

I've spent years in the working world and there are some people who seem naturally pointed at organizing and leading others. There are the opposite, also - dumb and dull plodders who don't seem to wish for anything more than a beer at the end of the day.

Is this the natural order of the world? Perhaps. But I think the natural order has been turned on its head from the industrial age onward.

There used to be a contract between the boss and his men, if they did as he asked then he would take care of them. A good boss would reward his people and create a community out of the group. We all know how untrue that is today.

So is the proper course of action to eliminate all leaders, or only the bad ones? How can we tell which ones will faithfully carry out the duties of their position?

I agree with you. Notice there's varying degrees of red pill everywhere you go. There's so much noise out there, anybody will believe what they want. This includes the narrative that pizza gate is real (it is) and that Trump is doing something about it (possible, but who's word do we have to believe?).

There's been nothing to prove to me he's taking them to war yet. There's been a ton of kvetching and the same narrative they ran with Obama... "we'd get more done but these darn obstructionists in the opposition party". Then you have a retarded AG to blame. Give him some controlled and benign victories (NK, Syria, muh economy).

We'll see what happens term two. I hope he opens up more.

All of history is basically a struggle between workers and owners.

Starts the beginning with marxist ideology.

Most of the struggles in history are religious, but whatever.

Owners end up as kings

or serfs and heads on pikes. but, once again whatever. You're just narrative building at this point.

usually in the form of pitchforks and beheadings

No, usually this is the more subtle expulsion of the "owner" (Fuck just call them bourgeois).

Modern government is basically an elaborate ploy to keep the workers calm.

No, this is a function of the police, dhs, and welfare departments. But, in general the range of functions that the government cover are quite a bit larger.

Going back to the 19th century there were massive labor riots

Yeah, almost like they've been funded for ever and a half and are a functional tactic of elitist groups.

no surprise public education ignores these events

If you haven't noticed. Public education barely scratches the surface of historic events. And, then you have the question of who is writing the material to cover and coming up with the policy of what can/can't be taught in school. But, you haven't made a point of what purpose teaching this portion of history would cover.

After Bush the workers had again become disillusioned with the government

Yeah, the economy was tanking because of military debt and legal immigration opened by the H1 programs (accelerated between 1970 - 1990).

I know it was run by obnoxious people, but the owners never like to see the workers aligning along class lines.

Because they're being persecuted for the workers poor life choices.

So Obama ramped up racial tensions in order to divide the workers again, as well as improting waves of immigrants to help keep the workers divided even more.

If anything, Obama didn't give a shit about internal issues. Obama in this case may be construed as the cabinet at the time working with businesses. But, what you're talking about is "The Deep State."

Also, Obama era DS was exporting more illegals then anybody up to that point. The legal immigration wasn't really messed with too much. The only point I could see was Obama era DS pushing through as many illegals to become legal as possible to buffer Dem votes.

At the time racial tensions were not that high because people were not that aware of the war on whites. They were hitting us and getting away with it for several decades.

But by the end of Obama people were very disengaged with the whole political process.

I'd say up until the clinton email drops it was all business as usual.

This is bad for the owners, they need people voting because it gives people the illusion that they have a stake in how the government is run.

You could put it that way. People who do vote have a tendency to continue to back people that they voted for. But, people who do not vote are generally disengaged from the political process entirely. There are a handful of people who do not vote as a political statement, but these people are just wasting their time as nobody else cares. The politically disengaged don't care, and people who have voted tell them to shut the fuck up because they didn't make a choice.

But, let's get to the fact that there's an active movement to attempt to get people to disengage from politics. As I'm reading through and commenting on this shit post (as it is a shit post full of illogical marxist crap) I get the feeling that this is the whole point of your post. A function of disengagement is easier control of the masses. "Don't try to put pressure for what you want." "We can destroy the system if not enough people care." "Let up so that one of the parties has an easier time." Multiple reasons for wanting disengagement. Fuck you.

So, how to get people back into voting? The answer is Trump.

Yes, let's put a massive crook up against a guy who actually is running on a platform of what people want. If Trump wasn't on the bill disengagement would have been higher (as you expected). But, you are not presenting a reason besides bourgeois like when people back the government.

And now everyone is super into politics with a passion not seen for generations.

Here's a concept for you. There were no outside choices for decades. Trump may be a relatively inside choice, but he wasn't deeply inbedded like previous presidents. You also have the whole marxist bullshit going rampant on the world stage. There's a lot more reasons to be political than trump. I'd have to say most of this movement started around gamer gate to be honest.

But, that is a conspiracy on itself. Why would the "Deep State" start fucking with "the opiate of the masses"? Try going down that rabbit holes and you can create all the stupid narratives you want.

All Trump has to do is pass some symbolic reforms

The wall is started. His cabinet has massively downsized regulations. Much of what he has done is far from being symbolic. But, that's not going to press.

And I have a feeling that is all that will happen.

That nothing is going to change. Ok, what do you want to see change? No really, what do you want to see change in the world?

Interesting take for sure, but SO SO much more seems to be going on behind the scenes, as gleened from the Q leaks, that this doesn't account for. Of course Q COULD be a larp, but if it is then it is being orchestrated by people that are way way smarter then I am because they have made it all so fucking convincing. I refuse to fully trust that Trump is our savior until I see Hillery, Obama, and Soros all in chains, but for now at least I support him as its the best option for right now.

No, the deep state wants him gone

That is an interesting take that cannot be dismissed as invalid. I think your scenario is in play, whether it’s the forefront of their intention or not.

There are producers and administrators in this world. The administration always wants to try and establish themselves as more important, because at any point the producers decide to cut them out; they are utterly fucking worthless and will die off quickly. They must convince producers of their worth and importance. They last only as long as producers believe their lies.

He has been constricting immigration across the board since he took office - causing wages to rise. How does that jibe with your theory?