Are Shills already on Voat? (Conspiracy)

submitted ago by dolphonebubleine

So there's direct shills and then second-hand shills who have already had their opinion changed and are now out to spread the message (like a virus). Obviously there will be a lot of second-hand shills as we are all exposed to so much mind control (like ads). But it seems very reasonable to me that Voat is already crawling with direct shills.

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

ColoradoJustice ago

You sound like someone who's so wound up on his own pretentiousness that you'd have to corkscrew your head out of your own ass.

Whatever you want to call me, that's up to you.

I'll imagine you'll call me a "shill" or whatever other word allows you and others to dismiss what I'm saying like some Orwellian double-speak nightmare.

Please spare me your attempts at a flame war with me.

I get it, I'm a douchebag who doesn't think his own shit smells. Despite the fact that the term "shill" doesn't apply to either of the scenarios that the submitter described, here you are going to WhiteKnight idiots and their desire to shout down people with false accusations.

Good on you, you've made the world a better place.

Please go find someone else to vomit your ideas upon like diarrhea of the mouth.

Sciency ago

You might have read something like this before, but you should also know, that we have too.

I don't give a fuck who you claim to be, you are not welcome here if you can't communicate without fallacy.

ColoradoJustice ago

Or is the fallacy the normalization of false accusations on strangers like "shill"?

Do you think it's not a fallacy to falsely accuse people of being paid to comment (actual definition of word "shill")?

Or do you think the English language now suddenly doesn't apply here?

Sciency ago

This is the final post I will be devoting to you, so if you are genuinely not a shill, please note (and I promise this is really easy to understand):

If you act like a dingus, it does not matter for a moment why you are acting like a dingus. You are using ad hominem in the place of reason, which is a problem. If you stop doing that, we will have no grounds upon which to accuse you of such a silly passtime as being a sock puppet (after all, who possibly live with themselves, lying to strangers for a living).

So.. yes or no answer here: Do ya feel me? Y'know, the general point here that Im trying to make? Yo comprendo? I sure hope so.

Have a simply magical day, I know I'm sure gonna try to do the same.

ColoradoJustice ago

so if you are genuinely not a shill, please note (and I promise this is really easy to understand):

This is a such a silly statement, it's so dumb! It's like you saying "if you're actually a human, not a robot..."

You cannot verify this one way or another and to continue with false accusations as though they do anything but destroy discussion is ridiculous.

If you act like a dingus, it does not matter for a moment why you are acting like a dingus. You are using ad hominem in the place of reason, which is a problem.

You mean what you're doing right now???

Please stop pretending that your own rules don't apply to you, hypocrite.

If you stop doing that, we will have no grounds upon which to accuse you of such a silly passtime as being a sock puppet (after all, who possibly live with themselves, lying to strangers for a living).

STFU and get a life you controlling weirdo.

You aren't Ellen Pao; get off your high horse and STFU.