Good video, I like Corbett but he didn't say it was not censorship at all. It is by definition censorship. He talking about the fact that more government control is bad and we have the option (and should) move to other platforms.
The entire point is what I said the first time. Government is not the answer and we are free to move to other platforms. I still didn't downvoat you. I don't see how you can say it isn't censorship. Are they deleting someones channel for content they don't agree with? Yes or no? That is censorship no matter what he says. What point in the video was he saying it wasn't?
Their platforms - their rules. Did Alex Jones violated their rules - yes he did. Can Alex Jones still make his show - yes he can. So no censorship. It's not the problem of silicon valley if Alex Jones is too stupid to build up his own platform for his show like Corbett did.
Don't even start with their "rules". He didn't break the rules on all 20 platforms he was banned from. He was banned from Twitter where he didn't even post. Not only that they can call anything "hate speech". Funny how the "rules" only seem to affect right-wing content. The term is meaningless. If you asked a 100 people to define that they would all have different definitions. He was censored on the platforms he was banned from, not from life. And he does have several of his own sites.
Your own platform your own rules - their platform their rules if you don't understand this and mix it up with censorship than you haven't understand the Corbett report.
Did you really agree with yourself on another account? It can be by their rules and be censorship at the same time. These aren't a local coffee shop removing someones flyer. They control tons of information and are using it for political gain.
view the rest of the comments →
anonymiss ago
Here it is explained why it is no censorship https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EqC82zmHccU
hang_em_high ago
Good video, I like Corbett but he didn't say it was not censorship at all. It is by definition censorship. He talking about the fact that more government control is bad and we have the option (and should) move to other platforms.
anonymiss ago
He clearly said more than one time in the video: "This is no censorship" but thank you for down-voting my comment ...
hang_em_high ago
I didn't downvoat you. I think you missed the entire point of the video though.
anonymiss ago
I'd happy to know what the "entire point" is? It's not censorship as Corbett said. And thanks for down-voting again, dude ;)
hang_em_high ago
The entire point is what I said the first time. Government is not the answer and we are free to move to other platforms. I still didn't downvoat you. I don't see how you can say it isn't censorship. Are they deleting someones channel for content they don't agree with? Yes or no? That is censorship no matter what he says. What point in the video was he saying it wasn't?
anonymiss ago
Their platforms - their rules. Did Alex Jones violated their rules - yes he did. Can Alex Jones still make his show - yes he can. So no censorship. It's not the problem of silicon valley if Alex Jones is too stupid to build up his own platform for his show like Corbett did.
hang_em_high ago
Don't even start with their "rules". He didn't break the rules on all 20 platforms he was banned from. He was banned from Twitter where he didn't even post. Not only that they can call anything "hate speech". Funny how the "rules" only seem to affect right-wing content. The term is meaningless. If you asked a 100 people to define that they would all have different definitions. He was censored on the platforms he was banned from, not from life. And he does have several of his own sites.
miriama ago
Your own platform your own rules - their platform their rules if you don't understand this and mix it up with censorship than you haven't understand the Corbett report.
larryhuston ago
Stupid cow, forgot you switched accounts.
hang_em_high ago
Did you really agree with yourself on another account? It can be by their rules and be censorship at the same time. These aren't a local coffee shop removing someones flyer. They control tons of information and are using it for political gain.