You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

un1ty ago

In this case, I think yes.

This whole Alex Jones theatrical display is just that - more Hegelian Dialectic.

The left gets vindicated that a hate speech monger is silenced, while simultaneously red-pilling tons of fence walkers as they're incapable of introspection to see how hypocritical they are.

The right gets vindicated that there is a concerted corporate effort to shut-down opposing thoughts, even if they don't subscribe to the Alex Jones Show, because Jones is known as a right-wing conspiracy theorist.

Why? What is really happening?

This isn't a "free-speech" issue because the 1st Amendment technically only protects the people against the government, i.e. it limits what the government can do. Seeing how Twatter, Fuckbook, et al are not government entities, they can shut down what they'd like. Sort of like a baker not baking that cock-shaped cake for a couple of fags.

Me personally? ALEX JONES IS BILL HICKS IS CONTROLLED OPPOSITION. All of this is done to discredit conspiracy theories and those that openly discuss them as hate speech. Look at the juxtaposition of these topics, these people, and the Communist Corporate Controllers response - CCCC: California Communist Corporate Controllers.

Sharipie ago

Technically, they're not government entities

un1ty ago

Correct - they have the right to do what they will as private entities. As I had said, the 1A only limits the government.

Guess we need to nationalize Twatter!

Sharipie ago

What I'm trying to say is that they are getting away with this censorship crap because they set everything up perfectly. The CIA sponsored these companies behind the scenes and without our knowledge. Once we were hooked on this social media platforms and couldn't live without them, they start the censorship and they get away with it because technically they are not part of the government. Although in reality they are because as we know now, they are CIA operatives.