I'm sure it was a missile of some kind, however, I am pretty sure the animated gif posted in that thread is a known fake.
The only official, and unofficial footage of the pentagon strike has been released as short, low frame rate video clip from two traffic booths. Unfortunately, it also appears to be footage that has been edited to remove the missile, and replace it with the "shape" of a plane nose, and other features.
If they used a plane, there would be no need to hide, or edit the security camera footage from the pentagon and the other locations that security camera footage was confiscated.
view the rest of the comments →
Adminstrater ago
I'm sure it was a missile of some kind, however, I am pretty sure the animated gif posted in that thread is a known fake.
The only official, and unofficial footage of the pentagon strike has been released as short, low frame rate video clip from two traffic booths. Unfortunately, it also appears to be footage that has been edited to remove the missile, and replace it with the "shape" of a plane nose, and other features.
Here is an explanation of the photoshop done to the footage: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=18AvDf2NWJU
Other footage from Hotel: https://www.disclose.tv/911-hotel-video-no-plane-hitting-the-pentagon-301282
Otherwise unseen after attack footage: https://www.disclose.tv/never-aired-about-pentagon-911-303538
Youtube summary: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JTJehfQkuyE
Dudesocks ago
The US gov had UAVs in WW2. Why use a missle when a 747 can be remotely piloted? It’s easier and more likely that the Saudi terrorists were trained, supplied, and funded by Isreal so as to bring Americas army into the Middle East. https://youtu.be/wQKkfq-U4v4 https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_unmanned_aerial_vehicles
Adminstrater ago
It wasn't easier to use a 747 than a missile. The lack of footage is what is bothersome, and would put all theories to bed.
Dudesocks ago
Why a missle would be a better choice over a remotely flown aircraft? Why would a missle be a better choice over Israeli trained and funded Saudis?
Adam_Jensen_ ago
It would be too difficult to even compensate for the ground effects and have a perfect entry horizontal into the building.
The slightest degree of roll would send one wing into the ground before hitting the building.
MegaDouche ago
Because it would be difficult to place a large aircraft in the exact position it needed to go to take out the pentagon. Trivial for a cruise missile.
Adminstrater ago
If they used a plane, there would be no need to hide, or edit the security camera footage from the pentagon and the other locations that security camera footage was confiscated.
Dudesocks ago
There is a reason to hide and edit film, the jews did the attack.
Adminstrater ago
All the better to keep it a secret... for the sake of status quo.