I'm starting this in the conspiracy forum because at the moment I am just formulating a theory.
The stated purpose of the Muslim invasion that has been forced on the EU and the US by the UN is due to declining native populations.
I believe that the actual reason is due to market saturation. Large corporations require consistant growth to provide profits to their shareholders. Watching the media, we see companies like Facebook and Twitter and many others losing membership. This leads to a lower value stock and less money to shareholders.
So what's easier to do? Expand their market to third work countries or bring the third world countries to where their business infrastructure already exists?
I don't believe that the real reason is about population decline. I believe it is about new customer decline.
Anyone with positive or negative thoughts on this, please post. As I said this is a theory I am trying to figure out and I welcome any comments.
view the rest of the comments →
muaddib78 ago
its a mix of that and liberal parties needing to constantly refresh the voting pool as people smarten up and begin to vote conservative.
without mass immigration liberal parties die off.
Gringojones ago
I fully believe that is the purpose of the Mexican invasion. But the Muslim invasion is being organized by the UN not the dems.
discobiscuit23 ago
I know some Mexicans here in Minnesota. A lot of them work on farms, or are pretty hard workers. Haven't really heard of any local mexicans causing problems up here, but the Muslim situation is out of hand. The Somalis are rude, they smell, and are greatly incompetent not expecting or willing to really get along because everything is handed to them. Refugees get like $300 and a license, just for being refugees. They get government benefits that I'll probably never see, same goes for the silly single mothers.