I'm starting this in the conspiracy forum because at the moment I am just formulating a theory.
The stated purpose of the Muslim invasion that has been forced on the EU and the US by the UN is due to declining native populations.
I believe that the actual reason is due to market saturation. Large corporations require consistant growth to provide profits to their shareholders. Watching the media, we see companies like Facebook and Twitter and many others losing membership. This leads to a lower value stock and less money to shareholders.
So what's easier to do? Expand their market to third work countries or bring the third world countries to where their business infrastructure already exists?
I don't believe that the real reason is about population decline. I believe it is about new customer decline.
Anyone with positive or negative thoughts on this, please post. As I said this is a theory I am trying to figure out and I welcome any comments.
view the rest of the comments →
Le_Squish ago
In order for the (((1%))) to stay in power, they need a new sucker. They have lots of scams that they inflict upon the population: pharmaceutical industry, education, debt, corporatism, propaganda. However, people become immunized overtime and start to resist so a new sucker not wise to their schemes has to be brought in.
Gringojones ago
This is basically what I'm trying to point out. I'm not the most eloquent speaker.