I'm starting this in the conspiracy forum because at the moment I am just formulating a theory.
The stated purpose of the Muslim invasion that has been forced on the EU and the US by the UN is due to declining native populations.
I believe that the actual reason is due to market saturation. Large corporations require consistant growth to provide profits to their shareholders. Watching the media, we see companies like Facebook and Twitter and many others losing membership. This leads to a lower value stock and less money to shareholders.
So what's easier to do? Expand their market to third work countries or bring the third world countries to where their business infrastructure already exists?
I don't believe that the real reason is about population decline. I believe it is about new customer decline.
Anyone with positive or negative thoughts on this, please post. As I said this is a theory I am trying to figure out and I welcome any comments.
view the rest of the comments →
anoncastillo ago
I think that's a factor. Also they want an easily controlled underclass of cheap labor and guaranteed consumers, hence the importation of young third world men and welfare state.
bb22 ago
There are many factors because there are many different "elitists" with many different agendas. Some of them simply want genocide.