For example, we could include information pertaining to 9/11, the federal reserve, wealth distribution, GMOs, vaccines, the NWO, extraterrestrials, you name it! Only strong supporting evidence will be included, perhaps chosen by an agreed-upon percentage of readers here (80%? 90%?), determined by a yea (or upvoat) or nay in the comments (since many of us still aren't able to downvoat).
I feel like compiling such information and making it easily-accessible to new readers and veterans alike will foster a better informed community that will in turn generate more valuable discussions. And as an added bonus it will allow us to easily shut down shill arguments from the get-go with factual and thorough rebuttals. What do you guys think?
Edit: OK so it looks like many of you seem in favor of this (or at least 11 of you as of this edit, haha), so how about we give it a practice run right here? If you have the inclination to do so, leave a comment that includes a title, link and brief TL;DR of what the source discusses. An upgoat of that comment will be taken as a yea and a downvoat as a nay. Since downvoating is reserved to those with >100 comment karma, many can't downvoat in the first place, and furthermore downvoat tallies cannot be considered accurate as one person could downvoat and comment negatively resulting in a doubling of their voting power. Therefore, everyone who disagrees the source should be presented on the sticky should comment with some variation of "no". Yeaers and Nayers alike are encouraged to include their reasoning for why they voted the way they did. Let's make this happen guys!
Edit 2: What would ya'll think about a weekly thread about each of these subjects, going from most popular to least popular? For example week one could be 9/11, week 2 the JFK assassination, week 3 MK Ultra, etc? To get a general overview of what we as a community are interested in I've taken the liberty to create a basic conspiracy strawpoll that will hopefully be a good gauge of what we're interested in the most so that we can begin with this project straightaway! Here it is, if your preferred topic isn't listed feel free to post it in a comment!
view the rest of the comments →
madmalloy ago
How about a list of what you consider to be credible sources?
samtrovaum ago
Seriously. Who cares about the source. I care about the facts. Bozo de Clown could say grass is green but because Bozo said it, it would be discredited. There is no such thing as 'credible sources', there are people with reputations for telling the truth.
Charlie_Prime ago
Credible Sources are people with reputations for telling the truth.
They are valuable.
madmalloy ago
I can go with that.