All I heard here were ad hominem attacks levied by embittered ex-associates. What is this supposed to prove exactly? What I have seen from Jones, and from Trump, is a disruption of the status quo of the establishment. Ok great, so there are obvious signs of collaboration with the Bilderbergers, Goldman, and so on, but how do you run an administration without those participants that are so uncategorically engrained in the current political zeitgeist?

Other than that, there is nothing here that isn't a vitriolic personal attack against a man who has made it his mission to bring so many to the table to even have the discussion.