If you think the new and the old testament god is the same you are a complete retard. One is a blood god that demands blood sacrifices and the other doesn't. They are different religions with different gods.
Jews hold no power of their own. They never have. Only the power they gain through subversion.
They are historically. Weak people. They held some land for the briefest of times. Eaked out an existance as swindlers and nomads. Until given power by foolish idealistic christians who thought they could rise above Usury simply by outlawing it. Much like drugs, or sex or other VICES. When made illegal instead of unnecessary only become far worse than left in their debased natural state.
Now, foolish liberal christians thinking they could solve vice through law. Handed the keys to mankinds fate to a bunch of swindling bastards.
Of course really... Considering the first half of their fucking biblical texts were written by jews. Not to far fetched to believe that was orchestrated.
The first usury laws of the christian church where probably whispered by a jew.
But because you are weak and fear death...You happily cut your children so as to appease a god you've never spoken to. Never seen. Never felt. So you can live a lie.
I have a slightly different perspective on the "power of jews"
"Back in the days", when they were deemed too much of a threat by TPTB, they were expelled, physically removed from society, happened a couple of times especially in europe
The power jews, as a whole, have today, is mostly an american story, it's their alliance with modern evangelical christians that truly gave them the "keys of the city", and they (evangelical leaders) did so for questionable prophetic reasons, allegedly http://archive.is/P5Xza#selection-411.0-411.777
Protestants, to this day, in europe have often sided with jews, against the papacy. Jews, free masons, protestants all banded together to bring down catholicism
For a long time, the Spanish Inquisition had been associated principally with persecution of Protestants. Nineteenth-century historian José Amador de los Ríos brought a focus to bear on the situation of Spain's large converso population.[3]
The two most significant and extensively-cited sources of this revised analysis of the historiography of the inquisitorial proceedings are Inquisition (1988) by Edward Peters and The Spanish Inquisition: An Historical Revision (1997) by Henry Kamen. These works focus on identifying and correcting what they argue are popular modern misconceptions about the inquisitions and historical misinterpretations of their activities. Kamen's 1997 book is updated and revised from an edition first published in 1965. Kamen takes the position that the Inquisition in Spain was motivated more by political considerations than religious, that the monarchs routinely protected those close to the crown, and that in Aragon large areas either defied or hindered its operation.[5] Eric Rust of Baylor University describes Kamen's work as "historical revision at its best".[5]
Helen Rawlings credits Kamen with launching a movement to revisit the historical record.[2] Rawlings identifies four distinct phases, as over time the Inquisition in Spain adapted to changing conditions. From 1480 to 1525 there was an intense persecution of conversos suspected of continuing to practice Judaism. From 1525 to 1630 there was an increased concern of possible Protestant influence on "Old Christians". A less active period from 1630 to 1725 periodically looked to Portuguese "New Christians" operating in Spanish commercial sectors; and from 1725 to 1824 traditionalists and liberals argued the future of the institution.[6]
view the rest of the comments →
13107575? ago
It is almost as if @9-11's Abraham desert "god" is the same as the Islamic and Jewish god...
TeddyJackson ago
If you think the new and the old testament god is the same you are a complete retard. One is a blood god that demands blood sacrifices and the other doesn't. They are different religions with different gods.
0fsgivin ago
There is no larger or more dangerous supporters of Jews than Christians...
In fact they are who give Jews power. A traitor is far more dangerous than an enemy at the gates.
kalgon ago
Yeah tell that to mel gibson lol
0fsgivin ago
Jews hold no power of their own. They never have. Only the power they gain through subversion.
They are historically. Weak people. They held some land for the briefest of times. Eaked out an existance as swindlers and nomads. Until given power by foolish idealistic christians who thought they could rise above Usury simply by outlawing it. Much like drugs, or sex or other VICES. When made illegal instead of unnecessary only become far worse than left in their debased natural state.
Now, foolish liberal christians thinking they could solve vice through law. Handed the keys to mankinds fate to a bunch of swindling bastards.
Of course really... Considering the first half of their fucking biblical texts were written by jews. Not to far fetched to believe that was orchestrated.
The first usury laws of the christian church where probably whispered by a jew.
But because you are weak and fear death...You happily cut your children so as to appease a god you've never spoken to. Never seen. Never felt. So you can live a lie.
kalgon ago
I have a slightly different perspective on the "power of jews"
"Back in the days", when they were deemed too much of a threat by TPTB, they were expelled, physically removed from society, happened a couple of times especially in europe
https://www.biblebelievers.org.au/expelled.htm
Inquisition too, was mostly centered around the problem of "conversos"/fake christian converts https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Converso
So, in my perspective it's not the medieval christians who gave power to the jews, as a matter of fact until rather recently they were mostly pariahs https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martin_Luther_and_antisemitism#Evolution_of_his_views
...
The power jews, as a whole, have today, is mostly an american story, it's their alliance with modern evangelical christians that truly gave them the "keys of the city", and they (evangelical leaders) did so for questionable prophetic reasons, allegedly http://archive.is/P5Xza#selection-411.0-411.777
0fsgivin ago
Really, the inquistion was after an expullsion of muslims. The war was already won.
The inquisition was rich corrupt catholic scum killing protestant freedom loving protestants.
Evangelicals today remind me of catholics more and more.
kalgon ago
During the spanish inquisition the deal was quite clear, either you convert to catholicism or raus, no tolerance toward traitors
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slavery_in_Spain search for the word jew to get an idea
Protestants, to this day, in europe have often sided with jews, against the papacy. Jews, free masons, protestants all banded together to bring down catholicism
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historical_revision_of_the_Inquisition
For a long time, the Spanish Inquisition had been associated principally with persecution of Protestants. Nineteenth-century historian José Amador de los Ríos brought a focus to bear on the situation of Spain's large converso population.[3]
The two most significant and extensively-cited sources of this revised analysis of the historiography of the inquisitorial proceedings are Inquisition (1988) by Edward Peters and The Spanish Inquisition: An Historical Revision (1997) by Henry Kamen. These works focus on identifying and correcting what they argue are popular modern misconceptions about the inquisitions and historical misinterpretations of their activities. Kamen's 1997 book is updated and revised from an edition first published in 1965. Kamen takes the position that the Inquisition in Spain was motivated more by political considerations than religious, that the monarchs routinely protected those close to the crown, and that in Aragon large areas either defied or hindered its operation.[5] Eric Rust of Baylor University describes Kamen's work as "historical revision at its best".[5]
Helen Rawlings credits Kamen with launching a movement to revisit the historical record.[2] Rawlings identifies four distinct phases, as over time the Inquisition in Spain adapted to changing conditions. From 1480 to 1525 there was an intense persecution of conversos suspected of continuing to practice Judaism. From 1525 to 1630 there was an increased concern of possible Protestant influence on "Old Christians". A less active period from 1630 to 1725 periodically looked to Portuguese "New Christians" operating in Spanish commercial sectors; and from 1725 to 1824 traditionalists and liberals argued the future of the institution.[6]