Media feminist agenda? Why do they lie so blatantly about something this irrelevant? (Conspiracy)

submitted ago by wootnessmonsters

Wired: "Because she is a women!"

The Verge: "Much of this rage was aimed directly at Pao, sometimes with particularly vicious racism and misogyny"

The Guardian: "Why is the world so angry with Pao? Could it be she is a women..."

New York Times: "Fighter of sexism is out of reddit!"

There are a lot more. But everyone is pretty much the same: "Oh, the reddit community are sexist misogynist etc etc...that's why they hate Pao..."

Nothing is mentioned that this whole thing started because of Victoria being fired (AFAIK A WOMEN) and EVERYONE defended her. So...what's going on?

EDIT: Archived links! Thanks @the_subhorizon for help!!

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

wootnessmonsters ago

I'm well aware, but Victoria was the tip of the iceberg, the last drop before the cup run over. You know what I mean...

Sciency ago

The straw the broke the camels back, perhaps?

The snowflake that caused he avalanche?

(I promise I'm not making fun of you, I just love isms.)