Hi again, folks! Your friendly neighborhood Mumberthrax here with a quick report on happenings and goings-on about our subverse to keep you au courant. (I learned that term today when trying to make this post!)
But first, thanks to everyone for your words of support in the previous mod-post. I'm very happy that you guys approve of the direction we're moving toward. Also, welcome all newcomers! Voat has seen a massive increase in traffic over the past week, so I hope that you find our little subverse to your liking. : )
So here's a rundown on some recent meta-/v/conspiracy stuff
Mentioned in the previous mod-post:
Near future
This is my current informal near-future to-do list, sorted in no particular order:
- Get the moderation policy approved by the mods, confirmed by the community, and adopted officially.
- Get rules and sidebar updates approved by the mods, confirmed by community, and adopted officially.
- Have a community discussion about how mods should be selected, and formalize policy on this.
- Have a community discussion about bigotry/racism and conspiracy theories to figure out where we all stand.
- Solicit ideas for topics to discuss on weekly sticky'd discussion posts.
- Begin having weekly sticky'd discussions about topics the community chooses.
- Establish a good method for mod-team communication - maybe /v/conspiracymeta, IRC, Slack.com, etc.
- Continue exploring ideas and suggestions from the brainstorming posts and other community discussions and prioritize them.
- Round up recent meta-posts on /v/conspiracy and cross-post links on /v/conspiracymeta for historical purposes.
Oh is that all?
Whew. That's it for now! Thanks again for hanging around, you crazy kooky conspiracy kids! And as always, if you have any suggestions or complaints, let us know! Or compliments, those are nice too. :3
view the rest of the comments →
Mumberthrax ago
I'm glad you approve!
Someone else previously suggested in one of our brainstorming posts having some way to tag posts on the quality of the sources backing them up. I think it's a neat concept and would be really handy if we found a way to implement it well in an objective and fair sense, as well as functional and easy to use. Seems like it warrants further brainstorming!
Tleilaxu_Ghola ago
Isn't that what the voting system is supposed to do? I don't want to have a systemic way of discrediting people like this idea seems to be opening the door to. I don't think people need their hands held here that much.