The thread had a lot of speculation that Snowden had posted the Lifelog and fb coincidence based on implications in q's posts. Saying it was definitely Snowden would be dishonest.
Q cant confirm such a thing, because he would be breaking a law, so he has to be vague about it. I suspect Q is DTJ and they use the board to communicate with their allies and spread a little disinfo to their enemies.
I cant recall the exact hedlines that led me to believe this, I tried searching for them on bing and goo but with no success. I remember an article where someone called out DTJ for being a criminal leaker (confidential stuff), I found an article of Wolf accusing Trump of being the biggest leaker. I recall a theory that DTJ visits 4chan but I cant recall details and cant find it anywhere. When I search for DTJ I find a lot of unrelated news searches. We know for sure that there are at least 2 4channers close to the White House.
Normally I'd say no but in this case Snowden would have to deal with the annoyance of having to tell people he had nothing to do with this. You see how things go viral. This could get much bigger.
The anon who really did make the connection should get the kudos. Q secondarily.
So it doesn't make that much difference? I'd consider an annoyance to Snowden to be a minor issue compared to the magnitude of this revelation to the normies. (We, however, have known this for years. Look up In-Q-Tel.)
view the rest of the comments →
NeedleStack ago
I think you're confusing an interaction between an anon and Q last night with Snowden.
An anon made this connection and Q did not confirm nor deny but his remark looked like an affirmation to me.
Q posts.
Edward Snowden's twitter (where he does not tweet about this).
drkthrowawy ago
what do I do when I see information disappear even on darknet? worry not goats censorship happens everywhere i just saw it
mods just deleted an entire thread by this guy while I was trying to comment fml
https://imgur.com/a/chldC
https://ea5ledvxmplkqhwd.onion.casa/q5awtlnbml.png/lecm1laxvt.png/hy24m4vhey.png
screenshot goats always document everything
yeah im drunk and yeah repost this shit before lost forever
Draurgothoth ago
Oh look another Q-ueer!
telleveryoneyouknow ago
Regardless, sharing false leads is counterproductive
NeedleStack ago
Would it make you feel more comfortable if I wrote, "The typist currently known as Q"? I have no clue if the guy is for real.
Draurgothoth ago
Same here. I'm just tired of the " muh awakening" circlejerk.
NeedleStack ago
I hear ya.
CowWithBeef ago
The thread had a lot of speculation that Snowden had posted the Lifelog and fb coincidence based on implications in q's posts. Saying it was definitely Snowden would be dishonest.
dooob ago
Q cant confirm such a thing, because he would be breaking a law, so he has to be vague about it. I suspect Q is DTJ and they use the board to communicate with their allies and spread a little disinfo to their enemies.
NeedleStack ago
I agree Q can't confirm. If he did, it might help people figure out who he is. I don't see Trump writing those posts at all but an insider patriot.
dooob ago
I cant recall the exact hedlines that led me to believe this, I tried searching for them on bing and goo but with no success. I remember an article where someone called out DTJ for being a criminal leaker (confidential stuff), I found an article of Wolf accusing Trump of being the biggest leaker. I recall a theory that DTJ visits 4chan but I cant recall details and cant find it anywhere. When I search for DTJ I find a lot of unrelated news searches. We know for sure that there are at least 2 4channers close to the White House.
https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/151285365/#151290476 They post very convincing proof.
kneo24 ago
Who is DTJ?
dooob ago
Donald Trump Jr
Awful-Falafel ago
Does it matter who found it?
NeedleStack ago
Normally I'd say no but in this case Snowden would have to deal with the annoyance of having to tell people he had nothing to do with this. You see how things go viral. This could get much bigger.
The anon who really did make the connection should get the kudos. Q secondarily.
Awful-Falafel ago
So it doesn't make that much difference? I'd consider an annoyance to Snowden to be a minor issue compared to the magnitude of this revelation to the normies. (We, however, have known this for years. Look up In-Q-Tel.)
NeedleStack ago
Thanks! I will read up on In-Q-Tel.
SpeshulSnowflaek ago
Thanks NS. You are smart and cool and everybody really likes you.
NeedleStack ago
Umm... is that sarcasm lol?
SpeshulSnowflaek ago
No :3