There's quite literally nothing in your newspaper clipping that would suggest this was a remote takeover.
Such things are probably possible, but think about it, if some alphabet agency wanted to kill you, they'd just use a bullet. They're trying to push gun control anyway, bullets are easy and cheap, they have plenty of people who can use them. There's no logical reason why they'd crash some rando's car.
view the rest of the comments →
Jtriangle ago
There's quite literally nothing in your newspaper clipping that would suggest this was a remote takeover.
Such things are probably possible, but think about it, if some alphabet agency wanted to kill you, they'd just use a bullet. They're trying to push gun control anyway, bullets are easy and cheap, they have plenty of people who can use them. There's no logical reason why they'd crash some rando's car.
lordbeatlejuicethe1 ago
how do you know it was random?
Jtriangle ago
I haven't seen anything here or on the chans to suggest that the stiff was somebody special.
Obviously we don't know if he was or not. I'm saying that the methods are unlikely spook related.
lordbeatlejuicethe1 ago
well we just do not have enough evidence to rule anything out
Tallest_Skil ago
Bullets are too messy and raise too many questions. They use the heart attack gun they admitted on congressional record to having several decades ago.
Jtriangle ago
A heart attack would be more suspicious if the person was young and healthy though.
Both are easier and more foolproof than crashing your self driving car.