Uhh, no straw man, here. Maybe you should look up what a straw man is:
A straw man is a common form of argument and is an informal fallacy based on giving the impression of refuting an opponent's argument, while actually refuting an argument that was not presented by that opponent.
If a person thinks 9/11 needs thousands of people to be done, that person can't also believe the official story. Work it out in your head.
yes.. your comment about 20 hijackers ( it was 19 ) does not relate to my post, whatsoever.
The post implies 5200 Pentagon staffers walking around with child porn presents a clear case for widespread blackmail. Btw, why was the investigation dropped not once, but TWICE ?
19 hijackers absolutely did not pull off 9/11... for fuck sake, how did everyone suddenly assume amateurs can fly jumbo jets like Chuck Yeager?
just fucking stop... you are clearly a fucking retarded cunt
the post is in QUOTATIONS, you fucking moron.. do you know what that means? You already established you don't know what a straw man is, because you continue to use it..
that means I AM NOT MAKING THE ARGUMENT, you jackass.
My rhetorical questions were never meant for you. I was asking the person who said the quote - rhetorically.
You got very combative from the start, attacking me, yelling, basically having a tantrum. You're even sending me nasty PMs because screaming at me here isn't enough.
And all because you thought I disagreed with you.
You really need to calm down and go do something to relieve that stress. You're going to give yourself a heart attack.
'How did 20 Saudis pull out off, like you say actually happened?'
^^^ I asked you to clear this gobblygook up, you stupid fuck. It does not even make sense ( out off ? ). And where did I SAY 20 hijackers pulled off 9/11? I didn't, you fucking faggot. You said that. That was your strawman response.
I'm not stressed, you dumb cunt. I'm stomping on your fucking tiny brain and outing you as a dipshit.
You're an awfully grumpy person. You keep being rude and name calling as if that's a valid argument. Are you triggered? Do you need a safe space and your blankey?
view the rest of the comments →
clamhurt_legbeard ago
Then...
How did 20 Saudis pull out off, like you say actually happened?
Oh_Well_ian ago
try asking again..
this time in clear English and w/o any straw man rhetorical bullshit
clamhurt_legbeard ago
Uhh, no straw man, here. Maybe you should look up what a straw man is:
If a person thinks 9/11 needs thousands of people to be done, that person can't also believe the official story. Work it out in your head.
Oh_Well_ian ago
yes.. your comment about 20 hijackers ( it was 19 ) does not relate to my post, whatsoever.
The post implies 5200 Pentagon staffers walking around with child porn presents a clear case for widespread blackmail. Btw, why was the investigation dropped not once, but TWICE ?
19 hijackers absolutely did not pull off 9/11... for fuck sake, how did everyone suddenly assume amateurs can fly jumbo jets like Chuck Yeager?
clamhurt_legbeard ago
Did you read your own title? It's self-contradictory on the face of it.
How did 20 Saudis execute 9/11 if it takes "THOUSANDS" to do it?
Oh_Well_ian ago
just fucking stop... you are clearly a fucking retarded cunt
the post is in QUOTATIONS, you fucking moron.. do you know what that means? You already established you don't know what a straw man is, because you continue to use it..
clamhurt_legbeard ago
Quote where you think I used it even once. You don't even understand my argument.
As for the quoted text, if it takes THOUSANDS to pull off 9/11, then 20 people aren't enough.
2,000 =/= 20
Easy math proving the quote wrong.
Oh_Well_ian ago
you stupid son of a bitch.. the post is in QUOTATIONS, that means I AM NOT MAKING THE ARGUMENT, you jackass.
It's the argument used to shoot down the 9/11 Truth Movement believing a massive conspiracy took place.
Please don't ask me to clear this up again, you have officially destroyed my faith in the human race over the last 5 minutes.
clamhurt_legbeard ago
My rhetorical questions were never meant for you. I was asking the person who said the quote - rhetorically.
You got very combative from the start, attacking me, yelling, basically having a tantrum. You're even sending me nasty PMs because screaming at me here isn't enough.
And all because you thought I disagreed with you.
You really need to calm down and go do something to relieve that stress. You're going to give yourself a heart attack.
Oh_Well_ian ago
'How did 20 Saudis pull out off, like you say actually happened?'
^^^ I asked you to clear this gobblygook up, you stupid fuck. It does not even make sense ( out off ? ). And where did I SAY 20 hijackers pulled off 9/11? I didn't, you fucking faggot. You said that. That was your strawman response.
I'm not stressed, you dumb cunt. I'm stomping on your fucking tiny brain and outing you as a dipshit.
YugeDick ago
You're an awfully grumpy person. You keep being rude and name calling as if that's a valid argument. Are you triggered? Do you need a safe space and your blankey?
clamhurt_legbeard ago
You never said they pulled anything off. You quoted a person making a dumb comment and I agreed with you and pointed out how dumb the comment was.
Then you misunderstood me and spent the next half hour desperately hurling abuse at me and the rest of us who pointed out how silly the comment was.
Why are you so emotionally attached to a quote you didn't say, giving an opinion you disagree with?
Why have you spent a half hour attacking anybody who disagrees with a quote you, yourself don't believe?
As for the first line of mine you quoted (which wasn't a strawman, still waiting on you to quote me supposedly using a strawman) it had a typo
I'll fix it for you: