You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

o0shad0o ago

Article from Nov 1st, with no additional confirmation since then.

GizaDog ago

Who do you want to conform it?

Alpha_Voat_Protecter ago

Literally any other news sources, with literally any other citations or references, in order to minimize the chances that this is Fake News?

GizaDog ago

So you want CNN, CBS or the Clinton's to admit its all true? Where you going with this?

Alpha_Voat_Protecter ago

What about Breitbart? American Renaissance? Infowars? Hell, what about any alt-right sites or conspiracy sites that broke a big exclusive story which was eventually picked up by other alt-right/conspiracy sites?

Nope, you've got none of that. Just a bunch of old unsourced stories from random websites with no reputation, and no updates on the old claim since it was made.

Your poor fact-checking is exactly the kind of reason why conspiracy forums can fall down false "rabbit holes" and lose the short opportunities to actually find out the truth behind the false narrative.

GizaDog ago

What? You are losing the battle and everyone sees it. We've been preparing to hunt you down and bring the justice.

Bend over!

Alpha_Voat_Protecter ago

implying that I'm some kind of shill

Don't make me laugh, you retard cuck. I've been a Voat niggerfaggot since the day FPH was kicked off of Reddit, and both my original account and this alt earned "Spam Killer" tags from some of the moderators here for my work calling out the real shills and spammers.

All I asked for was "literally any other source for this claim".

It doesn't matter whether the other site has any updates, it doesn't matter if it's basically the same article, it doesn't matter what kind of bias the site has, all I asked for was "one other source".

AND YOUR RETARD ASS SOMEHOW GOT THE IMPRESSION THAT, instead of just linking to one other source to give further evidence of the article's legitimacy, YOU THOUGHT I COULD BE SILENCED BY A TINY LITTLE ARGUMENT AND A HANDFUL OF DOWNVOTES!!!

Now that we both have fully identified ourselves as long-time users of this site, I expect you to provide 1 simple link, to show that "some other journalist beyond the writer of this 2-month-old article" had reached out to their sources and thought this story had some legs to stand on.

GizaDog ago

I like a feisty user

It doesn't matter whether the other site has any updates, it doesn't matter if it's basically the same article, it doesn't matter what kind of bias the site has, all I asked for was "one other source".

Did I not reply with another link directly to you or withing this post?

Did you even click on the link and see all the other supporting links within it?

Who do you think is going to back something like this that would satisfy you?

Its like who has the balls to go after the Bush / Clinton Cartel?

Alpha_Voat_Protecter ago

Once again, you seem to be incapable of even copy-pasting 1 link upon request (even though you claim that the site you linked as plenty of "other supporting links" to choose from.

Are you dyslexic as well as retarded, or just a grade-F retard?

GizaDog ago

Don't project your inertness on to others. Its sad.